Fed Spend Map

Programs › 93.240

Assistance listing · 93.240

State Capacity Building

Federal financial assistance obligated under listing 93.240, the organisations that receive it and where it goes.

USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026.

Federal agencies obligated $29M in awards under assistance listing 93.240, State Capacity Building, in FY2026, and $82M over the five fiscal years since FY2023; the program ranks 793 of 988 on this site.

Obligations were up 35% on FY2025 ($22M), with $0 so far in FY2027.

The largest recipient organisations by the value of $1.0M-plus awards since FY2023 were The Center for Asbestos Related Disease, Inc. ($5.9M), State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services ($3.0M) and Oregon Health Authority-Public Health ($2.8M).

By place of performance, the most money went to MT, TX and MI.

$29Mobligations, FY2026FY2026 (1 Oct 2025 – 30 Sep 2026) · obligations
$82Mfive-year totalFY2023–FY2027 to date · obligations
$0FY2027 to dateFY2027 · obligations
793 of 988rank among programs on this sitefive-year obligations
34awards of $1.0M+ since FY2023FY2023–FY2027

Obligations by fiscal year

$14M
$17M
$22M
$29M
$0
FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026FY2027*
Obligations under listing 93.240 by fiscal year. *FY2027 runs to the data date and is incomplete.

Compared with the largest program FY2026

MeasureThis programGrants to States for MedicaidAll assistance
Obligations, FY2026$29M$722B$4.4T
Five-year total$82M$2.6T$17T
Share of all assistance obligations, five years0%15.2%100%

Largest recipients $1.0M+ award value since FY2023

#OrganisationAwardsAward value
1The Center for Asbestos Related Disease, Inc.1$5.9M
2State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services1$3.0M
3Oregon Health Authority-Public Health1$2.8M
4State of Alaska Department of Health1$2.6M
5Tennessee Department of Health1$2.5M
6State of New Mexico1$2.4M
7Missouri Department of Health & Senior Services1$2.3M
8Pennsylvania Department of Health1$2.2M
9Public Health, Massachusetts Department of1$2.2M
10Ohio Department of Health1$2.1M
11Michigan Department of Health and Human Services1$2.1M
12Department of Public Health Connecticut1$2.1M
13State of Rhode Island Department of Health1$2.1M
14Health, New Jersey Department of1$2.1M
15Department of State Health Services1$2.0M

Awarding agencies $1.0M+ awards

Where the money goes

Largest awards since FY2023

RecipientAwarding agencyTypeAward valueBegunPlaceRecord
The Center for Asbestos Related Disease, Inc.Department of Health and Human ServicesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionGrantProject Grant (B)$5.9M28 Jul 2024MTUSAspending
State of Wisconsin Department of Health ServicesDepartment of Health and Human ServicesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$3.0M17 Mar 2023WVUSAspending
Oregon Health Authority-Public HealthDepartment of Health and Human ServicesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$2.8M17 Mar 2023ORUSAspending
State of Alaska Department of HealthDepartment of Health and Human ServicesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$2.6M31 Mar 2023AKUSAspending
Tennessee Department of HealthDepartment of Health and Human ServicesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$2.5M22 Mar 2023TNUSAspending
State of New MexicoDepartment of Health and Human ServicesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$2.4M31 Mar 2023NMUSAspending
Missouri Department of Health & Senior ServicesDepartment of Health and Human ServicesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$2.3M22 Mar 2023MOUSAspending
Pennsylvania Department of HealthDepartment of Health and Human ServicesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$2.2M23 Mar 2023PAUSAspending
Public Health, Massachusetts Department ofDepartment of Health and Human ServicesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$2.2M17 Mar 2023MAUSAspending
Ohio Department of HealthDepartment of Health and Human ServicesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$2.1M28 Mar 2023OHUSAspending

Other programs numbered 93.xxx

Questions and answers

How much is obligated under assistance listing 93.240?

$29M in FY2026 and $82M over the five fiscal years since FY2023, counting every award type recorded under the listing (grants, direct payments, loan subsidy cost, insurance and other assistance). Obligations are commitments, not payments.

Who receives the most under State Capacity Building?

The Center for Asbestos Related Disease, Inc. ($5.9M), State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services ($3.0M), Oregon Health Authority-Public Health ($2.8M), State of Alaska Department of Health ($2.6M), Tennessee Department of Health ($2.5M). Individuals are never listed; where a program pays individuals, USAspending records aggregated rows that appear here as "not shown".

What is an assistance listing (CFDA) number?

A five-digit number that identifies a federal financial assistance program on SAM.gov (formerly the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance). Every grant, loan, direct payment or other assistance award on USAspending carries one; contracts do not.

Provenance

Source: USAspending.gov API v2, spending by category (assistance listing) by fiscal year, recipient cross-tabulation for FY2022–FY2025 and award search, loaded 30 Sep 2026. State figures come from each state's top-100 listing table, so small amounts in a state may be missing. See methodology.