Fed Spend Map

Programs › 10.560

Assistance listing · 10.560

State Administrative Expenses for Child Nutrition

Federal financial assistance obligated under listing 10.560, the organisations that receive it and where it goes.

USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026.

Federal agencies obligated $401M in awards under assistance listing 10.560, State Administrative Expenses for Child Nutrition, in FY2026, and $1.7B over the five fiscal years since FY2023; the program ranks 200 of 988 on this site.

Obligations were down 20% on FY2025 ($503M), with $0 so far in FY2027.

The largest recipient organisations over FY2022–FY2025 were Agriculture, Texas Department of ($309M), Department of Education California ($237M) and New York State Education Department ($114M).

By place of performance, the most money went to CA, TX and NY.

$401Mobligations, FY2026FY2026 (1 Oct 2025 – 30 Sep 2026) · obligations
$1.7Bfive-year totalFY2023–FY2027 to date · obligations
$0FY2027 to dateFY2027 · obligations
200 of 988rank among programs on this sitefive-year obligations
274awards of $1.0M+ since FY2023FY2023–FY2027

Obligations by fiscal year

$329M
$482M
$503M
$401M
$0
FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026FY2027*
Obligations under listing 10.560 by fiscal year. *FY2027 runs to the data date and is incomplete.

Compared with the largest program FY2026

MeasureThis programGrants to States for MedicaidAll assistance
Obligations, FY2026$401M$722B$4.4T
Five-year total$1.7B$2.6T$17T
Share of all assistance obligations, five years0%15.2%100%

Largest recipients obligations, FY2022–FY2025

#OrganisationObligations
1Agriculture, Texas Department of$309M
2Department of Education California$237M
3New York State Education Department$114M
4Illinois State Board of Education$86M
5Pennsylvania DEPT of Education$79M
6Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services Florida$73M
7New Jersey Department of Agriculture$68M
8Department of Social Services California$59M
9Department of Education Indiana$52M
10Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education$48M
11Georgia DEPT of Education$47M
12Commonwealth of Virginia State Board of Education$46M
13Maryland State Department of Education$42M
14Michigan Department of Education$41M
15Elementary & Secondary Education Missouri Department of$41M
16Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction$40M
17Ohio Department of Education$39M
18State Department of Education$34M
19LA DEPT. of ADMIN$34M
20Alabama State Department of Education$31M
21Minnesota Department of Education$31M
22Arizona Department of Education$30M
23NYS Department of Health$28M
24Superintendent of Public Instruction$28M
25Department of Education Arkansas$28M

Awarding agencies $1.0M+ awards

Where the money goes

Largest awards since FY2023

RecipientAwarding agencyTypeAward valueBegunPlaceRecord
Agriculture, Texas Department ofDepartment of AgricultureFood and Nutrition ServiceGrantFormula Grant (a)$56M16 Oct 2025TXUSAspending
Agriculture, Texas Department ofDepartment of AgricultureFood and Nutrition ServiceGrantFormula Grant (a)$50M10 Oct 2023TXUSAspending
Agriculture, Texas Department ofDepartment of AgricultureFood and Nutrition ServiceGrantFormula Grant (a)$45M15 Oct 2024TXUSAspending
Agriculture, Texas Department ofDepartment of AgricultureFood and Nutrition ServiceGrantFormula Grant (a)$40M13 Oct 2022TXUSAspending
Department of Education CaliforniaDepartment of AgricultureFood and Nutrition ServiceGrantFormula Grant (a)$39M15 Oct 2024CAUSAspending
Department of Education CaliforniaDepartment of AgricultureFood and Nutrition ServiceGrantFormula Grant (a)$37M11 Oct 2023CAUSAspending
Department of Education CaliforniaDepartment of AgricultureFood and Nutrition ServiceGrantFormula Grant (a)$35M16 Oct 2025CAUSAspending
Department of Education CaliforniaDepartment of AgricultureFood and Nutrition ServiceGrantFormula Grant (a)$26M13 Oct 2022CAUSAspending
Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services FloridaDepartment of AgricultureFood and Nutrition ServiceGrantFormula Grant (a)$23M15 Oct 2024FLUSAspending
Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services FloridaDepartment of AgricultureFood and Nutrition ServiceGrantFormula Grant (a)$21M11 Oct 2023FLUSAspending

Other programs numbered 10.xxx

Questions and answers

How much is obligated under assistance listing 10.560?

$401M in FY2026 and $1.7B over the five fiscal years since FY2023, counting every award type recorded under the listing (grants, direct payments, loan subsidy cost, insurance and other assistance). Obligations are commitments, not payments.

Who receives the most under State Administrative Expenses for Child Nutrition?

Agriculture, Texas Department of ($309M), Department of Education California ($237M), New York State Education Department ($114M), Illinois State Board of Education ($86M), Pennsylvania DEPT of Education ($79M). Individuals are never listed; where a program pays individuals, USAspending records aggregated rows that appear here as "not shown".

What is an assistance listing (CFDA) number?

A five-digit number that identifies a federal financial assistance program on SAM.gov (formerly the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance). Every grant, loan, direct payment or other assistance award on USAspending carries one; contracts do not.

Provenance

Source: USAspending.gov API v2, spending by category (assistance listing) by fiscal year, recipient cross-tabulation for FY2022–FY2025 and award search, loaded 30 Sep 2026. State figures come from each state's top-100 listing table, so small amounts in a state may be missing. See methodology.