Fed Spend Map

Programs › 12.401

Assistance listing · 12.401

National Guard Military Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Projects

Federal financial assistance obligated under listing 12.401, the organisations that receive it and where it goes.

USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026.

Federal agencies obligated $2.4B in awards under assistance listing 12.401, National Guard Military Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Projects, in FY2026, and $9.6B over the five fiscal years since FY2023; the program ranks 56 of 1043 on this site.

Obligations were about level on FY2025 ($2.4B), with $0 so far in FY2027.

The largest recipient organisations over FY2022–FY2025 were California Military Department ($442M), Mississippi Military Department ($423M) and Adjutant General Indiana Office of ($344M).

By place of performance, the most money went to MS, PA and MI.

$2.4Bobligations, FY2026FY2026 (1 Oct 2025 – 30 Sep 2026) · obligations
$9.6Bfive-year totalFY2023–FY2027 to date · obligations
$0FY2027 to dateFY2027 · obligations
56 of 1043rank among programs on this sitefive-year obligations
1,203awards of $1.0M+ since FY2023FY2023–FY2027

Obligations by fiscal year

$2.4B
$2.4B
$2.4B
$2.4B
$0
FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026FY2027*
Obligations under listing 12.401 by fiscal year. *FY2027 runs to the data date and is incomplete.

Compared with the largest program FY2026

MeasureThis programGrants to States for MedicaidAll assistance
Obligations, FY2026$2.4B$723B$4.4T
Five-year total$9.6B$2.6T$17T
Share of all assistance obligations, five years0.1%15.2%100%

Largest recipients obligations, FY2022–FY2025

#OrganisationObligations
1California Military Department$442M
2Mississippi Military Department$423M
3Adjutant General Indiana Office of$344M
4Pennsylvania Department of Military & Veterans Affairs$331M
5Military & Vet Affairs DEPT$322M
6Department of Military Affairs Minnesota$316M
7New York State Division of Military & Naval Affairs$261M
8Texas Military Department$254M
9Military Department, Arkansas National Guard$240M
10Virginia Department of Military Affairs$239M
11Department of Military Affairs Wisconsin$229M
12Department of Military Alabama$227M
13Department of Military Florida$226M
14Commonwealth of Massachusetts Military Division$218M
15Arizona Department of Emergency & Military Affairs$218M
16Iowa Department of Public Defense$213M
17State of Idaho Military Division$199M
18Department of Military Oregon$198M
19Military, Tennessee Department of$195M
20National Guard Ohio$194M
21West Virginia Adjutant General$171M
22National Guard, Utah$168M
23Illinois Department of Military Affairs$163M
24Military Department of the State of Oklahoma$159M
25Kansas Adjutant General Department$156M

Awarding agencies $1.0M+ awards

Where the money goes

Largest awards since FY2023

RecipientAwarding agencyTypeAward valueBegunPlaceRecord
Virginia Department of Military AffairsDepartment of DefenseDepartment of the ArmyGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$128M11 Oct 2022VAUSAspending
California Military DepartmentDepartment of DefenseDepartment of the ArmyGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$83M1 Oct 2024CAUSAspending
Military & Vet Affairs DEPTDepartment of DefenseDepartment of the ArmyGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$72M1 Oct 2022MIUSAspending
California Military DepartmentDepartment of DefenseDepartment of the ArmyGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$71M1 Oct 2023CAUSAspending
Mississippi Military DepartmentDepartment of DefenseDepartment of the ArmyGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$67M1 Oct 2023MSUSAspending
Mississippi Military DepartmentDepartment of DefenseDepartment of the ArmyGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$66M1 Oct 2024MSUSAspending
California Military DepartmentDepartment of DefenseDepartment of the ArmyGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$66M1 Oct 2022CAUSAspending
Adjutant General Indiana Office ofDepartment of DefenseDepartment of the ArmyGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$65M1 Oct 2022INUSAspending
Department of Military Affairs MinnesotaDepartment of DefenseDepartment of the ArmyGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$65M1 Oct 2025MNUSAspending
Mississippi Military DepartmentDepartment of DefenseDepartment of the ArmyGrantCooperative Agreement (B)$62M24 Oct 2022MSUSAspending

Other programs numbered 12.xxx

Questions and answers

How much is obligated under assistance listing 12.401?

$2.4B in FY2026 and $9.6B over the five fiscal years since FY2023, counting every award type recorded under the listing (grants, direct payments, loan subsidy cost, insurance and other assistance). Obligations are commitments, not payments.

Who receives the most under National Guard Military Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Projects?

California Military Department ($442M), Mississippi Military Department ($423M), Adjutant General Indiana Office of ($344M), Pennsylvania Department of Military & Veterans Affairs ($331M), Military & Vet Affairs DEPT ($322M). Individuals are never listed; where a program pays individuals, USAspending records aggregated rows that appear here as "not shown".

What is an assistance listing (CFDA) number?

A five-digit number that identifies a federal financial assistance program on SAM.gov (formerly the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance). Every grant, loan, direct payment or other assistance award on USAspending carries one; contracts do not.

Provenance

Source: USAspending.gov API v2, spending by category (assistance listing) by fiscal year, recipient cross-tabulation for FY2022–FY2025 and award search, loaded 30 Sep 2026. State figures come from each state's top-100 listing table, so small amounts in a state may be missing. See methodology.