Fed Spend Map

Programs › 15.018

Assistance listing · 15.018

Energy Community Revitalization Program (ECRP)

Federal financial assistance obligated under listing 15.018, the organisations that receive it and where it goes.

USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026.

Federal agencies obligated $336M in awards under assistance listing 15.018, Energy Community Revitalization Program (ECRP), in FY2026, and $1.4B over the five fiscal years since FY2023; the program ranks 240 of 988 on this site.

Obligations were down 27% on FY2025 ($458M), with $0 so far in FY2027.

The largest recipient organisations over FY2022–FY2025 were Texas Railroad COMM ($254M), Oklahoma Corporation Commission ($128M) and Conservation, California Department of ($122M).

By place of performance, the most money went to OK, KY and WV.

$336Mobligations, FY2026FY2026 (1 Oct 2025 – 30 Sep 2026) · obligations
$1.4Bfive-year totalFY2023–FY2027 to date · obligations
$0FY2027 to dateFY2027 · obligations
240 of 988rank among programs on this sitefive-year obligations
32awards of $1.0M+ since FY2023FY2023–FY2027

Obligations by fiscal year

$39M
$542M
$458M
$336M
$0
FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026FY2027*
Obligations under listing 15.018 by fiscal year. *FY2027 runs to the data date and is incomplete.

Compared with the largest program FY2026

MeasureThis programGrants to States for MedicaidAll assistance
Obligations, FY2026$336M$722B$4.4T
Five-year total$1.4B$2.6T$17T
Share of all assistance obligations, five years0%15.2%100%

Largest recipients obligations, FY2022–FY2025

#OrganisationObligations
1Texas Railroad COMM$254M
2Oklahoma Corporation Commission$128M
3Conservation, California Department of$122M
4Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection$101M
5Energy & Environment Cabinet$85M
6Department of Natural Resources$83M
7Department of Conservation and Energy, State of Louisiana$73M
8Department of Environmental Conservation New York$70M
9West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection$60M
10Corporation Commission Kansas$59M
11Energy Minerals & Natural Resources Department$56M
12Department of Administration$53M
13North Dakota Industrial Commission, Oil & Gas Division$50M
14Colorado Department of Natural Resources$50M
15Department of Natural Resources Illinois$44M
16Natural Resources, Indiana Department of$39M
17Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy$36M
18Osage Nation$30M
19Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Dba: Adeq$26M
20State of Wyoming-Oil & Gas$25M
21Florida Department of Environmental Protection$25M
22Nebraska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission$25M
23Natural Resources & Conservation, Montana DEPT of$16M
24Mississippi State Gas & Oil Board$14M
25Ark Oil & Gas Com$11M

Awarding agencies $1.0M+ awards

Where the money goes

Largest awards since FY2023

RecipientAwarding agencyTypeAward valueBegunPlaceRecord
Recipient not shownDepartment of the InteriorDepartmental OfficesGrantFormula Grant (a)$120M21 Sep 2025TXUSAspending
Recipient not shownDepartment of the InteriorDepartmental OfficesGrantFormula Grant (a)$80M12 Jan 2024TXUSAspending
Energy & Environment CabinetDepartment of the InteriorDepartmental OfficesGrantFormula Grant (a)$35M22 Sep 2025KYUSAspending
Energy Minerals & Natural Resources DepartmentDepartment of the InteriorDepartmental OfficesGrantFormula Grant (a)$35M18 Dec 2025NMUSAspending
Department of Conservation and Energy, State of LouisianaDepartment of the InteriorDepartmental OfficesGrantFormula Grant (a)$35M12 Dec 2025LAUSAspending
Recipient not shownDepartment of the InteriorDepartmental OfficesGrantProject Grant (B)$30M12 Sep 2025TXUSAspending
West Virginia Department of Environmental ProtectionDepartment of the InteriorDepartmental OfficesGrantFormula Grant (a)$29M13 May 2024WVUSAspending
West Virginia Department of Environmental ProtectionDepartment of the InteriorDepartmental OfficesGrantFormula Grant (a)$29M27 Feb 2026WVUSAspending
Colorado Department of Natural ResourcesDepartment of the InteriorDepartmental OfficesGrantFormula Grant (a)$29M18 Dec 2025COUSAspending
Energy & Environment CabinetDepartment of the InteriorDepartmental OfficesGrantFormula Grant (a)$25M24 Apr 2024KYUSAspending

Other programs numbered 15.xxx

Questions and answers

How much is obligated under assistance listing 15.018?

$336M in FY2026 and $1.4B over the five fiscal years since FY2023, counting every award type recorded under the listing (grants, direct payments, loan subsidy cost, insurance and other assistance). Obligations are commitments, not payments.

Who receives the most under Energy Community Revitalization Program (ECRP)?

Texas Railroad COMM ($254M), Oklahoma Corporation Commission ($128M), Conservation, California Department of ($122M), Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection ($101M), Energy & Environment Cabinet ($85M). Individuals are never listed; where a program pays individuals, USAspending records aggregated rows that appear here as "not shown".

What is an assistance listing (CFDA) number?

A five-digit number that identifies a federal financial assistance program on SAM.gov (formerly the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance). Every grant, loan, direct payment or other assistance award on USAspending carries one; contracts do not.

Provenance

Source: USAspending.gov API v2, spending by category (assistance listing) by fiscal year, recipient cross-tabulation for FY2022–FY2025 and award search, loaded 30 Sep 2026. State figures come from each state's top-100 listing table, so small amounts in a state may be missing. See methodology.