Fed Spend Map

Agencies › Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Awarding agency · CFPB

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Award obligations by fiscal year and type, largest recipient organisations, places of performance, industries, programs and competition, as reported to USAspending.

USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau obligated $41M in awards in FY2026 and $494M over the five fiscal years since FY2023, 0% of all award obligations recorded on USAspending; it ranks 39 of 72 awarding agencies.

The FY2026 mix was 100% contracts; obligations were down 65% on FY2025, with $0 so far in FY2027.

Its largest recipient organisations over FY2022–FY2025 were Senture LLC ($46M), IT Concepts, Inc. ($45M) and Acumen Solutions, Inc. ($40M).

By place of performance, the most money went to DC, VA and KY.

$41Maward obligations, FY2026FY2026 (1 Oct 2025 – 30 Sep 2026) · obligations
$494Mfive-year totalFY2023–FY2027 to date · obligations0% of all award obligations
$0FY2027 to dateFY2027, through 30 Sep 2026 · obligations
$41Mcontracts, FY2026FY2026 · obligations
39 of 72rank among awarding agenciesfive-year obligations

Obligations by fiscal year and award type

$149M
$188M
$116M
$41M
$0
FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026FY2027*
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau award obligations by fiscal year and award type (awarding-agency view). *FY2027 runs to the data date and is incomplete.

Compared with all agencies FY2026

MeasureThis agencyLargest (Health and Human Services)All agencies
Award obligations, FY2026$41M$2.1T$5.1T
Contracts, FY2026$41M$24B$716B
Grants, FY2026$0$895B$1.2T
Direct payments, FY2026$0$1.2T$3.2T
Loans (subsidy cost), FY2026$0$0−$5.5B
Other assistance, FY2026$0$5.2B$21B
Share of all award obligations, five years0%38.5%100%

Largest recipient organisations FY2022–FY2025

#Recipient organisationObligationsShare
1Senture LLC$46M9%
2IT Concepts, Inc.$45M8%
3Acumen Solutions, Inc.$40M8%
4JND Holdings LLC$26M5%
5Deloitte Consulting LLP$26M5%
6Raft LLC$22M4%
7FCN, Inc.$21M4%
8Infotrend Incorporated$20M4%
9Aac Inc.$15M3%
10Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC$15M3%
11Lumen Technologies Government Solutions, Inc.$13M2%
12Ernst & Young LLP$12M2%
13Redmatter Solutions LLC$11M2%
14Censeo Consulting Group, Inc.$10M2%
15Fedsight-Jpi JV LLC$9.7M2%
16Golden IT LLC$8.6M2%
17Accenture Federal Services LLC$8.2M2%
18Metropolitan Life Insurance Co$8.1M2%
19Iss Action Inc$8.0M2%
20Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP$7.7M1%
21Dynamo Technologies, LLC$7.3M1%
22United Concordia Companies, Inc.$7.2M1%
23Minburn Technology Group, LLC$7.2M1%
24Rust Consulting, Inc.$6.9M1%
25Carahsoft Technology Corp$6.9M1%
26Epiq Class Action & Claims Solutions, Inc.$6.2M1%
27Lancer Information Solutions, LLC$6.0M1%
28ICF Incorporated, L.L.C.$5.7M1%
29O'Riordan Bethel Law Firm, LLP (the)$5.6M1%
30A1FEDIMPACT,LLC$5.4M1%
31Didlake Inc$5.2M1%
32Buchanan & Edwards, Inc.$5.1M1%
33Guidehouse LLP$4.4M1%
34Diamond Insight, Inc.$4.0M1%
35Focused Management, Inc.$4.0M1%
36Dev Technology Group Inc$3.5M1%
37Easy Dynamics Corporation$3.4M1%
38The Whitestone Group, Inc.$3.3M1%
39John J. Yim & Associates, LLC$3.3M1%
40Federal Management Partners, LLC$3.0M1%
41Advanced Computer Concepts, Inc.$3.0M1%
42Experian Information Solutions, Inc.$3.0M1%
43Enterprise Technology Solutions, Inc.$2.8M1%
44Defense Technology Integration LLC$2.8M1%
45The Northridge Group, Inc$2.7M1%
46Diaconia LLC$2.6M0%
47Analysis Group Inc$2.5M0%
48Techop Solutions International, Inc.$2.4M0%
49Countertrade Products, Inc.$2.2M0%
50Accelera Solutions Inc$2.2M0%
51Forum One Communications Corp$2.2M0%
52Gap Solutions, Inc.$2.1M0%
53Newview Oklahoma, Inc.$2.0M0%
54Bixal Solutions Incorporated$2.0M0%
55KPMG LLP$1.9M0%
56Fors Marsh Group LLC$1.9M0%
57Ama Consulting LLC$1.8M0%
58Dataworld, Inc.$1.7M0%
59Vinsys-Radiant LLC$1.6M0%

$8.4M among the top 60 went to recipients not shown: aggregated records (for example "multiple recipients"), individuals and withheld names.

Where the money goes place of performance

District of Columbia$249M · $90/resident/yr
Virginia$181M · $5/resident/yr
Kentucky$46M · $2/resident/yr
Washington$25M · $1/resident/yr
Maryland$22M · $1/resident/yr
New York$15M · $0/resident/yr
Kansas$9.0M · $1/resident/yr
Minnesota$6.7M · $0/resident/yr
Oregon$5.7M · $0/resident/yr
Massachusetts$4.7M · $0/resident/yr
North Carolina$4.5M · $0/resident/yr
Texas$3.7M · $0/resident/yr
Colorado$2.0M · $0/resident/yr
New Jersey$785K · $0/resident/yr
Pennsylvania$644K · $0/resident/yr

Competition contracts, FPDS extent competed

Full and open competition80%
Full and open competition after exclusion of sources11%
Not competed5%
Competed under simplified acquisition procedures2%
Not available for competition2%
Not competed under simplified acquisition procedures1%

FPDS "extent competed" codes as reported, FY2022–FY2025: $578M coded.

Contract industries NAICS

Largest awards begun since FY2026

RecipientTypeAward valueBegunPlaceRecord
Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc.ContractBpa Call$3.4M18 Feb 2026VAUSAspending
Rust Consulting, Inc.ContractDelivery Order$3.0M11 Aug 2026MNUSAspending
Redmatter Solutions LLCContractBpa Call$2.7M24 Mar 2026VAUSAspending
Raft LLCContractDelivery Order$2.2M8 Sep 2026VAUSAspending
Coresphere, LLCContractDelivery Order$2.1M16 Jun 2026MDUSAspending
Acumen Solutions, Inc.ContractDelivery Order$1.4M26 Nov 2025VAUSAspending
Lumen Technologies Government Solutions, Inc.ContractDelivery Order$1.2M20 Mar 2026DCUSAspending
District of Columbia, Government ofContractPurchase Order$1.1M25 Sep 2026DCUSAspending
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.ContractDelivery Order$1.1M10 Sep 2026CAUSAspending
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.ContractDelivery Order$1.1M24 Feb 2026DCUSAspending

Most $1.0M+ award value since FY2023

#Recipient organisationAwardsAward value
1JND Holdings LLC2$37M
2IT Concepts, Inc.2$21M
3Infotrend Incorporated1$18M
4Raft LLC5$18M
5Acumen Solutions, Inc.3$17M
6Aac Inc.1$16M
7Redmatter Solutions LLC2$14M
8Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC1$13M
9FCN, Inc.4$13M
10Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc.3$13M
11Golden IT LLC2$11M
12Lancer Information Solutions, LLC1$10M
13Fedsight-Jpi JV LLC1$9.7M
14Ernst & Young LLP1$6.7M
15Deloitte Consulting LLP2$6.7M

Questions and answers

How much does Consumer Financial Protection Bureau spend on contracts and grants?

$41M in award obligations in FY2026: $41M contracts, $0 grants, $0 direct payments, $0 loan subsidy cost and $0 other assistance.

Who are the largest Consumer Financial Protection Bureau contractors and grantees?

Over FY2022–FY2025: Senture LLC ($46M), IT Concepts, Inc. ($45M), Acumen Solutions, Inc. ($40M), JND Holdings LLC ($26M) and Deloitte Consulting LLP ($26M).

How competitive are Consumer Financial Protection Bureau contracts?

Of $578M in contract obligations over FY2022–FY2025 with an extent-competed code, 93% was coded as competed (full and open, after exclusion of sources, under simplified acquisition procedures, or competitive delivery orders), using the FPDS codes as reported.

Where does this data come from?

USAspending.gov award transactions, awarding-agency view, loaded 30 Sep 2026. Agency totals here count awards; budget authority and outlays are separate USAspending views.

Provenance

Source: USAspending.gov API v2, spending by category (awarding agency, awarding sub-agency, recipient, NAICS, assistance listing) and spending by geography, loaded 30 Sep 2026; cross-tabulations cover FY2022–FY2025. Agency figures count award obligations only; budget authority and outlays are separate USAspending views. See methodology.