Fed Spend Map

Agencies › Department of Energy

Awarding agency · DOE

Department of Energy

Award obligations by fiscal year and type, largest recipient organisations, places of performance, industries, programs and competition, as reported to USAspending.

USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026.

Department of Energy obligated $80B in awards in FY2025 and $300B over the five fiscal years since FY2022, 1.2% of all award obligations recorded on USAspending; it ranks 10 of 73 awarding agencies.

The FY2025 mix was 61% contracts, 36% grants; obligations were up 27% on FY2024, with $58B so far in FY2026.

Its largest recipient organisations over FY2022–FY2025 were National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC ($20B), Triad National Security, LLC ($19B) and Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC ($13B).

By place of performance, the most money went to NM, TN and CA.

$80Baward obligations, FY2025FY2025 (1 Oct 2024 – 30 Sep 2025) · obligations
$300Bfive-year totalFY2022–FY2026 to date · obligations1.2% of all award obligations
$58BFY2026 to dateFY2026, through 30 Sep 2026 · obligations
$49Bcontracts, FY2025FY2025 · obligations
10 of 73rank among awarding agenciesfive-year obligations

Obligations by fiscal year and award type

$46B
$54B
$63B
$80B
$58B
FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026*
Department of Energy award obligations by fiscal year and award type (awarding-agency view). *FY2026 runs to the data date and is incomplete.

Compared with all agencies FY2025

MeasureThis agencyLargest (Health and Human Services)All agencies
Award obligations, FY2025$80B$2.0T$5.3T
Contracts, FY2025$49B$21B$779B
Grants, FY2025$29B$826B$1.2T
Direct payments, FY2025$122M$1.2T$3.3T
Loans (subsidy cost), FY2025$1.4B$0$201M
Other assistance, FY2025$667M$1.7B$26B
Share of all award obligations, five years1.2%38.3%100%

Largest recipient organisations FY2022–FY2025

#Recipient organisationObligationsShare
1National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC$20B11%
2Triad National Security, LLC$19B10%
3Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC$13B7%
4Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC$13B7%
5UT-Battelle LLC$10B6%
6Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC$8.6B5%
7Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC$7.7B4%
8Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC$7.7B4%
9Fluor Marine Propulsion, LLC$7.4B4%
10Battelle Memorial Institute$6.3B3%
11Uchicago Argonne, LLC$4.6B2%
12Alliance for Energy Innovation, LLC$4.1B2%
13Mission Support & Test Services LLC$3.9B2%
14The Regents of the University of California$3.7B2%
15Savannah River Mission Completion, LLC$3.4B2%
16Brookhaven Science Associates LLC$3.4B2%
17Bechtel National, Inc.$2.9B2%
18The Leland Stanford Junior University$2.8B1%
19Washington River Protection Solutions LLC$2.4B1%
20Central Plateau Cleanup Company, LLC$2.3B1%
21United Cleanup Oak Ridge LLC$2.1B1%
22Idaho Environmental Coalition LLC$2.0B1%
23Pantexas Deterrence, LLC$1.9B1%
24Hanford Mission Integration Solutions, LLC$1.9B1%
25Fluor-BWXT Portsmouth LLC$1.9B1%
26The Regents of the University of California$1.7B1%
27Fermi Forward Discovery Group, LLC$1.7B1%
28Accenture Federal Services LLC$1.7B1%
29Salado Isolation Mining Contractors, LLC$1.5B1%
30Fermi Research Alliance, LLC$1.4B1%
31State of California Energy Commission$1.4B1%
32Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Incorporated$1.2B1%
33Battelle Savannah River Alliance, LLC$1.1B1%
34Pacific Gas and Electric Company$1.1B1%
35Newport News Nuclear BWXT-Los Alamos LLC$924M0%
36Jefferson Science Associates, LLC$918M0%
37X Energy, LLC$845M0%
38US SFR Owner LLC$837M0%
39Four Rivers Nuclear Partnership LLC$807M0%
40Hanford Tank Waste Operations & Closure, LLC$797M0%
41Department of Commerce Minnesota$789M0%
42Comptroller of Public Accounts$779M0%
43Department of Commerce Montana$747M0%
44The Trustees of Princeton University$745M0%
45Fluor Federal Petroleum Operations, LLC$673M0%
46Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources$634M0%
47Defensewerx, Inc.$632M0%
48General Atomics$625M0%
49Georgia Environmental Finance Authority$624M0%
50Centerra Group, LLC$607M0%
51Leidos, Inc.$586M0%
52Fca US LLC$585M0%
53Cleveland-Cliffs Steel Corporation$574M0%
54General Motors LLC$570M0%
55Ohio Department of Development$534M0%
56Department of Conservation and Energy, State of Louisiana$531M0%
57Michigan State University$512M0%
58Heidelberg Materials US Inc$509M0%
59National Cement Company of California, Inc.$500M0%
60Century Aluminum Co$500M0%

Where the money goes place of performance

New Mexico$40B · $4,723/resident/yr
Tennessee$29B · $996/resident/yr
California$28B · $179/resident/yr
Washington$17B · $545/resident/yr
South Carolina$15B · $671/resident/yr
Illinois$11B · $210/resident/yr
Pennsylvania$9.2B · $177/resident/yr
Idaho$9.2B · $1,137/resident/yr
Missouri$8.4B · $335/resident/yr
Colorado$6.3B · $262/resident/yr
New York$6.3B · $78/resident/yr
District of Columbia$6.2B · $2,219/resident/yr
Texas$5.7B · $45/resident/yr
Nevada$5.4B · $412/resident/yr
Ohio$4.8B · $101/resident/yr

Competition contracts, FPDS extent competed

Full and open competition95%
Full and open competition after exclusion of sources2%
Not available for competition2%
Not competed1%
Not competed under simplified acquisition procedures0%
Competed under simplified acquisition procedures0%
Non-competitive delivery order0%

FPDS "extent competed" codes as reported, FY2022–FY2025: $180B coded.

Contract industries NAICS

Assistance programs listings

Sub-agencies

Sub-agencyFY2025Five-year total
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission$155M$719M

Largest awards begun since FY2025

RecipientTypeAward valueBegunPlaceRecord
Blueoval SK, LLCLoanDirect Loan (e)$18Bloan face value13 Dec 2024MIUSAspending
Starplus Energy LLCLoanDirect Loan (e)$14Bloan face value2 Dec 2024INUSAspending
Rivian New Horizon, LLCLoanDirect Loan (e)$10.0Bloan face value25 Nov 2024CAUSAspending
Grain Belt Express LLCLoanDirect Loan (e)$4.4Bloan face value25 Nov 2024ILUSAspending
Andp Holdco LLCLoanGuaranteed/Insured Loan (F)$3.6Bloan face value23 Jun 2026—USAspending
Andp Holdco LLCLoanGuaranteed/Insured Loan (F)$3.6Bloan face value23 Jun 2026—USAspending
Andp Holdco LLCLoanDirect Loan (e)$3.5Bloan face value23 Jun 2026—USAspending
Andp Holdco LLCLoanDirect Loan (e)$3.5Bloan face value23 Jun 2026—USAspending
Andp Holdco LLCLoanGuaranteed/Insured Loan (F)$3.4Bloan face value23 Jun 2026—USAspending
Montana Renewables LLCLoanDirect Loan (e)$2.3Bloan face value16 Oct 2024MTUSAspending

Most $1.0M+ award value since FY2022

#Recipient organisationAwardsAward value
1Blueoval SK, LLC2$45B
2Andp Holdco LLC5$18B
3Starplus Energy LLC1$14B
4Rivian New Horizon, LLC1$10.0B
5Ultium Cells LLC1$5.0B
6Savannah River Mission Completion, LLC9$4.5B
7Grain Belt Express LLC1$4.4B
8Redwood Battery Materials NV, LLC1$3.8B
9Sunnova Energy Corporation2$3.6B
10Pantexas Deterrence, LLC1$3.6B
11United Cleanup Oak Ridge LLC1$2.5B
12Fermi Forward Discovery Group, LLC1$2.5B
13Montana Renewables LLC1$2.3B
14Lithium Nevada Corp.1$2.0B
15Koreplex, LLC1$1.7B

Questions and answers

How much does Department of Energy spend on contracts and grants?

$80B in award obligations in FY2025: $49B contracts, $29B grants, $122M direct payments, $1.4B loan subsidy cost and $667M other assistance.

Who are the largest Department of Energy contractors and grantees?

Over FY2022–FY2025: National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC ($20B), Triad National Security, LLC ($19B), Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC ($13B), Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC ($13B) and UT-Battelle LLC ($10B).

How competitive are Department of Energy contracts?

Of $180B in contract obligations over FY2022–FY2025 with an extent-competed code, 97% was coded as competed (full and open, after exclusion of sources, under simplified acquisition procedures, or competitive delivery orders), using the FPDS codes as reported.

Where does this data come from?

USAspending.gov award transactions, awarding-agency view, loaded 30 Sep 2026. Agency totals here count awards; budget authority and outlays are separate USAspending views.

Provenance

Source: USAspending.gov API v2, spending by category (awarding agency, awarding sub-agency, recipient, NAICS, assistance listing) and spending by geography, loaded 30 Sep 2026; cross-tabulations cover FY2022–FY2025. Agency figures count award obligations only; budget authority and outlays are separate USAspending views. See methodology.