Agencies › Federal Election Commission
Awarding agency · FEC
Federal Election Commission
Award obligations by fiscal year and type, largest recipient organisations, places of performance, industries, programs and competition, as reported to USAspending.
USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026.
Federal Election Commission obligated $11M in awards in FY2026 and $58M over the five fiscal years since FY2023, 0% of all award obligations recorded on USAspending; it ranks 56 of 72 awarding agencies.
The FY2026 mix was 100% contracts; obligations were down 23% on FY2025, with $0 so far in FY2027.
Its largest recipient organisations over FY2022–FY2025 were TCG Inc ($9.3M), Four Points Technology, L.L.C. ($7.4M) and Tygart Technology Inc ($4.6M).
By place of performance, the most money went to DC, VA and CA.
Obligations by fiscal year and award type
- Contracts $11M
Compared with all agencies FY2026
| Measure | This agency | Largest (Health and Human Services) | All agencies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Award obligations, FY2026 | $11M | $2.1T | $5.1T |
| Contracts, FY2026 | $11M | $24B | $716B |
| Grants, FY2026 | $0 | $895B | $1.2T |
| Direct payments, FY2026 | $0 | $1.2T | $3.2T |
| Loans (subsidy cost), FY2026 | $0 | $0 | −$5.5B |
| Other assistance, FY2026 | $0 | $5.2B | $21B |
| Share of all award obligations, five years | 0% | 38.5% | 100% |
Largest recipient organisations FY2022–FY2025
Where the money goes place of performance
Competition contracts, FPDS extent competed
FPDS "extent competed" codes as reported, FY2022–FY2025: $61M coded.
Contract industries NAICS
Largest awards begun since FY2026
| Recipient | Type | Award value | Begun | Place | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four Points Technology, L.L.C. | ContractDelivery Order | $2.5M | 23 Jul 2026 | DC | USAspending |
Most $1.0M+ award value since FY2023
| # | Recipient organisation | Awards | Award value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Salient Crgt, Inc. | 1 | $5.8M |
| 2 | Four Points Technology, L.L.C. | 1 | $2.5M |
| 3 | TCG Inc | 1 | $2.4M |
| 4 | Solutions BY Design Ii, LLC | 1 | $2.0M |
| 5 | Minburn Technology Group, LLC | 1 | $1.6M |
Questions and answers
How much does Federal Election Commission spend on contracts and grants?
$11M in award obligations in FY2026: $11M contracts, $0 grants, $0 direct payments, $0 loan subsidy cost and $0 other assistance.
Who are the largest Federal Election Commission contractors and grantees?
Over FY2022–FY2025: TCG Inc ($9.3M), Four Points Technology, L.L.C. ($7.4M), Tygart Technology Inc ($4.6M), Salient Crgt, Inc. ($4.4M) and Lumen Technologies Government Solutions, Inc ($4.3M).
How competitive are Federal Election Commission contracts?
Of $61M in contract obligations over FY2022–FY2025 with an extent-competed code, 94% was coded as competed (full and open, after exclusion of sources, under simplified acquisition procedures, or competitive delivery orders), using the FPDS codes as reported.
Where does this data come from?
USAspending.gov award transactions, awarding-agency view, loaded 30 Sep 2026. Agency totals here count awards; budget authority and outlays are separate USAspending views.
Provenance
Source: USAspending.gov API v2, spending by category (awarding agency, awarding sub-agency, recipient, NAICS, assistance listing) and spending by geography, loaded 30 Sep 2026; cross-tabulations cover FY2022–FY2025. Agency figures count award obligations only; budget authority and outlays are separate USAspending views. See methodology.