Agencies › International Trade Commission
Awarding agency · USITC
International Trade Commission
Award obligations by fiscal year and type, largest recipient organisations, places of performance, industries, programs and competition, as reported to USAspending.
USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026.
International Trade Commission obligated $8.5M in awards in FY2026 and $58M over the five fiscal years since FY2023, 0% of all award obligations recorded on USAspending; it ranks 55 of 72 awarding agencies.
The FY2026 mix was 100% contracts; obligations were down 52% on FY2025, with $0 so far in FY2027.
Its largest recipient organisations over FY2022–FY2025 were TCG Inc ($16M), Teksynap Corporation ($8.3M) and Lumen Technologies Government Solutions, Inc. ($5.1M).
By place of performance, the most money went to DC, VA and NY.
Obligations by fiscal year and award type
- Contracts $8.5M
Compared with all agencies FY2026
| Measure | This agency | Largest (Health and Human Services) | All agencies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Award obligations, FY2026 | $8.5M | $2.1T | $5.1T |
| Contracts, FY2026 | $8.5M | $24B | $716B |
| Grants, FY2026 | $0 | $895B | $1.2T |
| Direct payments, FY2026 | $0 | $1.2T | $3.2T |
| Loans (subsidy cost), FY2026 | $0 | $0 | −$5.5B |
| Other assistance, FY2026 | $0 | $5.2B | $21B |
| Share of all award obligations, five years | 0% | 38.5% | 100% |
Largest recipient organisations FY2022–FY2025
$361K among the top 60 went to recipients not shown: aggregated records (for example "multiple recipients"), individuals and withheld names.
Where the money goes place of performance
Competition contracts, FPDS extent competed
FPDS "extent competed" codes as reported, FY2022–FY2025: $65M coded.
Contract industries NAICS
Most $1.0M+ award value since FY2023
| # | Recipient organisation | Awards | Award value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Minburn Technology Group, LLC | 1 | $2.3M |
| 2 | Lee Hartman & Sons, Inc. | 1 | $1.4M |
| 3 | Moody's Analytics, Inc. | 1 | $1.4M |
Questions and answers
How much does International Trade Commission spend on contracts and grants?
$8.5M in award obligations in FY2026: $8.5M contracts, $0 grants, $0 direct payments, $0 loan subsidy cost and $0 other assistance.
Who are the largest International Trade Commission contractors and grantees?
Over FY2022–FY2025: TCG Inc ($16M), Teksynap Corporation ($8.3M), Lumen Technologies Government Solutions, Inc. ($5.1M), Minburn Technology Group, LLC ($3.1M) and FCN, Inc. ($1.6M).
How competitive are International Trade Commission contracts?
Of $65M in contract obligations over FY2022–FY2025 with an extent-competed code, 81% was coded as competed (full and open, after exclusion of sources, under simplified acquisition procedures, or competitive delivery orders), using the FPDS codes as reported.
Where does this data come from?
USAspending.gov award transactions, awarding-agency view, loaded 30 Sep 2026. Agency totals here count awards; budget authority and outlays are separate USAspending views.
Provenance
Source: USAspending.gov API v2, spending by category (awarding agency, awarding sub-agency, recipient, NAICS, assistance listing) and spending by geography, loaded 30 Sep 2026; cross-tabulations cover FY2022–FY2025. Agency figures count award obligations only; budget authority and outlays are separate USAspending views. See methodology.