Fed Spend Map

Industries › NAICS 111335

Industry · NAICS 111335 · sector 11 Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting

Tree Nut Farming

Federal contract obligations classified under NAICS 111335, the organisations that win them and the agencies that award them.

USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026.

Federal agencies obligated $35M in contracts classified under NAICS 111335, Tree Nut Farming, in FY2026, and $38M over the five fiscal years since FY2023; the industry ranks 512 of 526 on this site.

The largest recipient organisations by the value of $1.0M-plus awards since FY2023 were Pearl Crop, Inc. ($32M), Guidry Liason Group, Inc. ($2.5M) and Stutz Packing Company ($2.1M).

By place of performance, the most money went to CA.

$35Mcontract obligations, FY2026FY2026 (1 Oct 2025 – 30 Sep 2026) · obligations
$38Mfive-year totalFY2023–FY2027 to date · obligations
$0FY2027 to dateFY2027 · obligations
512 of 526rank among industries on this sitefive-year obligations
4awards of $1.0M+ since FY2023FY2023–FY2027

Contract obligations by fiscal year

$3.4M
$0
$0
$35M
$0
FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026FY2027*
Contract obligations under NAICS 111335 by fiscal year. *FY2027 runs to the data date and is incomplete.

Compared with the largest industry FY2026

MeasureThis industryAircraft ManufacturingAll contracts
Contract obligations, FY2026$35M$45B$716B
Five-year total$38M$211B$3.0T
Share of all contract obligations, five years0%7.1%100%

Top contractors $1.0M+ award value since FY2023

#OrganisationAwardsAward value
1Pearl Crop, Inc.1$32M
2Guidry Liason Group, Inc.2$2.5M
3Stutz Packing Company1$2.1M

Buying agencies $1.0M+ awards

Where the work is performed

Largest awards since FY2023

RecipientAwarding agencyTypeAward valueBegunPlaceRecord
Pearl Crop, Inc.Department of AgricultureAgricultural Marketing ServiceContractDefinitive Contract$32M26 Feb 2026CAUSAspending
Stutz Packing CompanyDepartment of AgricultureAgricultural Marketing ServiceContractDefinitive Contract$2.1M26 Feb 2026CAUSAspending
Guidry Liason Group, Inc.Department of AgricultureAgricultural Marketing ServiceContractDefinitive Contract$1.4M11 Jul 2023CAUSAspending
Guidry Liason Group, Inc.Department of AgricultureAgricultural Marketing ServiceContractDefinitive Contract$1.2M11 Jul 2023CAUSAspending

Other industries in sector 11: Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting

Questions and answers

How much does the federal government spend on NAICS 111335?

$35M in contract obligations classified under Tree Nut Farming in FY2026, $38M over the five fiscal years since FY2023. Obligations are commitments, not payments.

Who are the top contractors in Tree Nut Farming?

Pearl Crop, Inc. ($32M), Guidry Liason Group, Inc. ($2.5M), Stutz Packing Company ($2.1M), by the value of $1M-plus awards since FY2023.

Which agencies buy in this industry?

By the value of $1.0M-plus contracts since FY2023: Department of Agriculture ($37M).

What is a NAICS code?

In USAspending's words: "NAICS stands for the North American Industrial Classification System. This 6-digit code tells you what industry the work falls into. Each contract record has a NAICS code." Assistance awards (grants, loans, direct payments) carry no NAICS code and are not counted here.

Provenance

Source: USAspending.gov API v2, spending by category (NAICS) by fiscal year, recipient cross-tabulation for FY2022–FY2025 and award search, loaded 30 Sep 2026. State figures come from each state's top-100 NAICS list, so small amounts in a state may be missing. See methodology.