Fed Spend Map

Industries › NAICS 339930

Industry · NAICS 339930 · sector 31-33 Manufacturing

Doll, Toy, and Game Manufacturing

Federal contract obligations classified under NAICS 339930, the organisations that win them and the agencies that award them.

USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026.

Federal agencies obligated $0 in contracts classified under NAICS 339930, Doll, Toy, and Game Manufacturing, in FY2026, and $19M over the five fiscal years since FY2023; the industry ranks 543 of 544 on this site.

Obligations were down 100% on FY2025 ($5.1M), with $0 so far in FY2027.

The largest recipient organisations by the value of $1.0M-plus awards since FY2023 were Lakeshore Learning Materials, LLC ($4.0M), Glendale Parade Store, LLC ($1.8M) and Daisy Manufacturing Company ($1.8M).

By place of performance, the most money went to GA, KY and AR.

$0contract obligations, FY2026FY2026 (1 Oct 2025 – 30 Sep 2026) · obligations
$19Mfive-year totalFY2023–FY2027 to date · obligations
$0FY2027 to dateFY2027 · obligations
543 of 544rank among industries on this sitefive-year obligations
3awards of $1.0M+ since FY2023FY2023–FY2027

Contract obligations by fiscal year

$4.4M
$9.3M
$5.1M
$0
$0
FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026FY2027*
Contract obligations under NAICS 339930 by fiscal year. *FY2027 runs to the data date and is incomplete.

Compared with the largest industry FY2026

MeasureThis industryAircraft ManufacturingAll contracts
Contract obligations, FY2026$0$44B$716B
Five-year total$19M$210B$3.0T
Share of all contract obligations, five years0%7%100%

Top contractors $1.0M+ award value since FY2023

#OrganisationAwardsAward value
1Lakeshore Learning Materials, LLC1$4.0M
2Glendale Parade Store, LLC1$1.8M
3Daisy Manufacturing Company1$1.8M

Buying agencies $1.0M+ awards

Where the work is performed

Largest awards since FY2023

RecipientAwarding agencyTypeAward valueBegunPlaceRecord
Lakeshore Learning Materials, LLCDepartment of DefenseDepartment of the ArmyContractDelivery Order$4.0M25 Apr 2024GAUSAspending
Glendale Parade Store, LLCDepartment of DefenseDepartment of the ArmyContractPurchase Order$1.8M15 Sep 2025KYUSAspending
Daisy Manufacturing CompanyDepartment of DefenseDepartment of the ArmyContractDefinitive Contract$1.8M17 Sep 2024ARUSAspending

Other industries in sector 31-33: Manufacturing

Questions and answers

How much does the federal government spend on NAICS 339930?

$0 in contract obligations classified under Doll, Toy, and Game Manufacturing in FY2026, $19M over the five fiscal years since FY2023. Obligations are commitments, not payments.

Who are the top contractors in Doll, Toy, and Game Manufacturing?

Lakeshore Learning Materials, LLC ($4.0M), Glendale Parade Store, LLC ($1.8M), Daisy Manufacturing Company ($1.8M), by the value of $1M-plus awards since FY2023.

Which agencies buy in this industry?

By the value of $1.0M-plus contracts since FY2023: Department of Defense ($7.5M).

What is a NAICS code?

In USAspending's words: "NAICS stands for the North American Industrial Classification System. This 6-digit code tells you what industry the work falls into. Each contract record has a NAICS code." Assistance awards (grants, loans, direct payments) carry no NAICS code and are not counted here.

Provenance

Source: USAspending.gov API v2, spending by category (NAICS) by fiscal year, recipient cross-tabulation for FY2022–FY2025 and award search, loaded 30 Sep 2026. State figures come from each state's top-100 NAICS list, so small amounts in a state may be missing. See methodology.