Recipients › Texas › Intercultural Development Research Association
Recipient organisation · UEI E8JHFK2EN8Z2
Intercultural Development Research Association
USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026. View the USAspending recipient profile.
Intercultural Development Research Association, of San Antonio, TX, was obligated $8.5M in federal awards across the 2 fiscal years in which it reached the $1.0M listing floor (2023, 2025).
Intercultural Development Research Association ranks 1,505 of 1,565 listed organisations located in TX by five-year obligations, and 29,929 of 30,989 nationally.
Its $1.0M-plus awards since FY2023 came from Department of Education and Department of Agriculture: 2 awards worth $8.5M in total award value.
Obligations by fiscal year contracts vs assistance
| Fiscal year | All obligations | Contracts | Assistance | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2023 | $2,500,000 | under $1.0M | $2,500,000 | — |
| FY2024 | under $1.0M | — | — | — |
| FY2025 | $6,000,000 | under $1.0M | $6,000,000 | — |
| FY2026 | under $1.0M | — | — | — |
| FY2027 to date | under $1.0M | — | — | — |
A fiscal year runs 1 October to 30 September. "Contracts" are procurement award types A–D; "assistance" is everything else (grants, direct payments, loan subsidy cost, insurance, other). The contracts column is listed only where contract obligations alone reached $1.0M; the assistance figure is the remainder and may therefore include up to $1.0M of contracts.
Compared with its state and the largest recipients five listed years
| Measure | This organisation | Largest in TX | Largest nationally |
|---|---|---|---|
| Five-year obligations (listed years) | $8.5M | $179B | $416B |
| FY2026 obligations | under $1.0M | $46B | $118B |
| Contracts, five years | under $1.0M | under $1.0M | $94B |
| Assistance, five years | $8.5M | $179B | $416B |
| Rank by five-year obligations | 29,929 of 30,989 | 1 of 1,565 in TX | 1 |
Largest in state: Health & Human SVC COMMN TX. Largest nationally: Health Care Services, California Department of. Rankings count organisations located in the state, by the sum of their listed fiscal years.
Awarding agencies $1.0M+ awards since FY2023
| # | Agency | Awards | Award value | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Education | 1 | $6.0M | 71% |
| 2 | Department of Agriculture | 1 | $2.5M | 29% |
Assistance programs listings
Places of performance $1.0M+ awards
Counties: Bexar County, TX $8.5M
Largest awards begun since FY2023
| Awarding agency | Type | Industry or program | Award value | Begun | Place | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Education | GrantProject Grant (B) | 84.411 Education Innovation and Research (formerly Investing in Innovation (I3) Fund) | $6.0M | 19 Dec 2024 | TX | USAspending |
| Department of AgricultureNational Institute of Food and Agriculture | GrantCooperative Agreement (B) | 10.237 From Learning to Leading: Cultivating the Next Generation of Diverse Food and Agriculture Professionals | $2.5M | 26 May 2023 | TX | USAspending |
Award value is the amount obligated to the award to date as USAspending reports it. Descriptions below are USAspending's text, unedited and truncated; those that appear to name a person are withheld.
- $6.0M, Department of Education, 19 Dec 2024: TECHXPERTS
- $2.5M, Department of Agriculture, 26 May 2023: ** AWARDS ISSUED PRIOR TO JANUARY 20, 2025, WERE FUNDED UNDER PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATIONS AND MAY NOT REFLECT THE PRIORITIES AND POLICIES OF THE CURRENT ADMINISTRA
Questions and answers
How much federal money does Intercultural Development Research Association receive?
$8.5M in award obligations over the fiscal years it is listed for (FY2023: $2.5M; FY2025: $6.0M). Years not listed were under the $1.0M floor. Obligations are binding commitments, not payments made.
Which agencies award to Intercultural Development Research Association?
By the value of $1.0M-plus awards begun since FY2023: Department of Education ($6.0M) and Department of Agriculture ($2.5M).
What is the money for?
Assistance falls under Education Innovation and Research (formerly Investing in Innovation (I3) Fund) (84.411) and From Learning to Leading: Cultivating the Next Generation of Diverse Food and Agriculture Professionals (10.237).
Where is the work performed?
Primary places of performance for its larger awards: TX ($8.5M).
Is Intercultural Development Research Association a large federal recipient?
It ranks 29,929 of 30,989 organisations on this site by five-year obligations and 1,505 of 1,565 located in TX. The site covers organisations with at least $1.0M in a fiscal year; individuals are excluded.
Where does this data come from?
USAspending.gov (U.S. Treasury), award transactions as loaded on 30 Sep 2026; fiscal-year totals via the spending-by-category endpoint and award lists via the award search endpoint. The USAspending recipient profile is the authoritative record.
Provenance
Source: USAspending.gov API v2 (U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service), CC0. Fiscal-year obligations from the spending-by-category recipient ranking by recipient state (listing floor $1.0M per year); awards from the award search endpoint (new awards of $1.0M or more by base obligation date); parent and business categories from the recipient profile where fetched. Closed fiscal years are snapshots taken after year end; FY2027 is refreshed on each build. Data loaded by USAspending on 30 Sep 2026. Individuals and sole proprietors are excluded at ingest. Errors in processing are corrected at the next build; see corrections and the methodology.