Fed Spend Map

Recipients › Arizona › Better Direct, LLC

Recipient organisation · UEI J6EEK881G8H7

Better Direct, LLC

Tempe, AZ · rank 6,607 of 30,000 listed organisations · 131 of 544 in AZ

$18Maward obligations, FY2026100% contracts · 4 of 5 years listed

USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026. View the USAspending recipient profile.

Department of Defense → Contracts: $5.2MDepartment of the Treasury → Contracts: $3.0MGeneral Services Administration → Contracts: $2.4MDepartment of Homeland Security → Contracts: $1.9MDepartment of Veterans Affairs → Contracts: $1.7MDepartment of Defense$5.2MDepartment of the Treasury$3.0MGeneral Services Administration$2.4MDepartment of Homeland Security$1.9MDepartment of Veterans Affairs$1.7MContracts$14M
Awarding agencies to award types, by the value of awards of $1.0M or more begun since FY2023.

Federal agencies obligated $80M to Better Direct, LLC, Tempe, AZ, in the listed fiscal years 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026.

In FY2026, the most recent complete fiscal year, obligations were $18M, of which $18M (100%) came through contracts.

That is down 38% on FY2025 ($29M).

Better Direct, LLC ranks 131 of 544 listed organisations located in AZ by five-year obligations, and 6,607 of 30,000 nationally.

Its $1.0M-plus awards since FY2023 came from Department of Defense, Department of the Treasury and General Services Administration and 2 other agencies: 8 awards worth $14M in total award value.

Its largest contract industry is NAICS 334111 (Electronic Computer Manufacturing), where it ranks 82 of 164 organisations by the value of $1.0M-plus awards.

$18Mobligations, FY2026FY2026 (1 Oct 2025 – 30 Sep 2026) · obligations
$80Mfive-year total, listed yearsFY2023–FY2027 to date · obligations4 of 5 years listed
under $1.0MFY2027 to dateFY2027 (1 Oct 2026 – 30 Sep 2027), through 30 Sep 2026 · obligations
8awards of $1.0M+ begun since FY2023FY2023–FY2027$14M total award value
5awarding agenciesFY2023–FY2027

Obligations by fiscal year contracts vs assistance

$13M
$21M
$29M
$18M
under $1.0M
FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026FY2027*
Obligations to Better Direct, LLC by fiscal year: contracts (navy) and financial assistance (green). A year marked "under $1.0M" fell below the listing floor for that year. *FY2027 runs to the data date and is incomplete.
Fiscal yearAll obligationsContractsAssistanceChange
FY2023$13,209,612$13,209,612$0—
FY2024$20,990,826$20,990,826$0+59%
FY2025$28,541,154$28,541,154$0+36%
FY2026$17,668,104$17,668,104$0-38%
FY2027 to dateunder $1.0M———

A fiscal year runs 1 October to 30 September. "Contracts" are procurement award types A–D; "assistance" is everything else (grants, direct payments, loan subsidy cost, insurance, other). The contracts column is listed only where contract obligations alone reached $1.0M; the assistance figure is the remainder and may therefore include up to $1.0M of contracts.

Compared with its state and the largest recipients five listed years

MeasureThis organisationLargest in AZLargest nationally
Five-year obligations (listed years)$80M$70B$416B
FY2026 obligations$18M$19B$118B
Contracts, five years$80Munder $1.0M$94B
Assistance, five years$0$70B$416B
Rank by five-year obligations6,607 of 30,0001 of 544 in AZ1

Largest in state: Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System. Largest nationally: Health Care Services, California Department of. Rankings count organisations located in the state, by the sum of their listed fiscal years.

Awarding agencies $1.0M+ awards since FY2023

#AgencyAwardsAward valueShare
1Department of Defense4$5.2M37%
2Department of the Treasury1$3.0M21%
3General Services Administration1$2.4M17%
4Department of Homeland Security1$1.9M13%
5Department of Veterans Affairs1$1.7M12%

Contract industries NAICS

Rank within NAICS 334111: 82 of 164 organisations by $1.0M+ award value; see Electronic Computer Manufacturing.

Places of performance $1.0M+ awards

Arizona$7.4M
Vermont$1.9M
Texas$1.3M

Counties: Maricopa County, AZ $7.4M · District of Columbia, DC $2.4M · Chittenden County, VT $1.9M · Bexar County, TX $1.3M · Charleston County, SC $1.1M

Largest awards begun since FY2023

Awarding agencyTypeIndustry or programAward valueBegunPlaceRecord
Department of the TreasuryBureau of the Fiscal ServiceContractDelivery Order541519 Other Computer Related Services$3.0M16 Oct 2024AZUSAspending
General Services AdministrationFederal Acquisition ServiceContractDelivery Order541519 Other Computer Related Services$2.4M3 Mar 2026DCUSAspending
Department of Homeland SecurityU.S. Citizenship and Immigration ServicesContractDelivery Order334111 Electronic Computer Manufacturing$1.9M15 Sep 2026VTUSAspending
Department of Veterans AffairsContractDelivery Order334111 Electronic Computer Manufacturing$1.7M16 Jan 2024AZUSAspending
Department of DefenseDepartment of the Air ForceContractDelivery Order334111 Electronic Computer Manufacturing$1.7M26 Sep 2025AZUSAspending
Department of DefenseDepartment of the Air ForceContractDelivery Order541519 Other Computer Related Services$1.3M17 Mar 2026TXUSAspending
Department of DefenseDepartment of the Air ForceContractBpa Call334111 Electronic Computer Manufacturing$1.1M17 Sep 2024SCUSAspending
Department of DefenseDepartment of the Air ForceContractBpa Call334111 Electronic Computer Manufacturing$1.1M24 Sep 2025AZUSAspending

Award value is the amount obligated to the award to date as USAspending reports it. Descriptions below are USAspending's text, unedited and truncated; those that appear to name a person are withheld.

Questions and answers

How much federal money does Better Direct, LLC receive?

$80M in award obligations over the fiscal years it is listed for (FY2023: $13M; FY2024: $21M; FY2025: $29M; FY2026: $18M). Years not listed were under the $1.0M floor. Obligations are binding commitments, not payments made.

Which agencies award to Better Direct, LLC?

By the value of $1.0M-plus awards begun since FY2023: Department of Defense ($5.2M), Department of the Treasury ($3.0M), General Services Administration ($2.4M), Department of Homeland Security ($1.9M) and Department of Veterans Affairs ($1.7M).

What is the money for?

Contracts are classified under NAICS 334111 Electronic Computer Manufacturing and NAICS 541519 Other Computer Related Services.

Where is the work performed?

Primary places of performance for its larger awards: AZ ($7.4M), DC ($2.4M), VT ($1.9M) and TX ($1.3M).

Is Better Direct, LLC a large federal recipient?

It ranks 6,607 of 30,000 organisations on this site by five-year obligations and 131 of 544 located in AZ. The site covers organisations with at least $1.0M in a fiscal year; individuals are excluded.

Where does this data come from?

USAspending.gov (U.S. Treasury), award transactions as loaded on 30 Sep 2026; fiscal-year totals via the spending-by-category endpoint and award lists via the award search endpoint. The USAspending recipient profile is the authoritative record.

Provenance

Source: USAspending.gov API v2 (U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service), CC0. Fiscal-year obligations from the spending-by-category recipient ranking by recipient state (listing floor $1.0M per year); awards from the award search endpoint (new awards of $1.0M or more by base obligation date); parent and business categories from the recipient profile where fetched. Closed fiscal years are snapshots taken after year end; FY2027 is refreshed on each build. Data loaded by USAspending on 30 Sep 2026. Individuals and sole proprietors are excluded at ingest. Errors in processing are corrected at the next build; see corrections and the methodology.