Congressional district · 119th Congress boundaries
Federal spending in CO-08: Colorado's 8th congressional district
USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026.
Colorado's 8th congressional district received $3.9B in federal award obligations in FY2026: $5,334 for each of its 724,072 residents.
That is below the Colorado rate of $11,062 per resident (48% of it) and below the national rate of $14,744; it ranks 8 of 8 districts in the state.
The FY2026 mix was 90% direct payments.
Obligations were down 17% on FY2025, and the five-year total since FY2023 is $15B.
Over FY2022–FY2025, the largest awarding agencies were Social Security Administration ($5.8B), Department of Health and Human Services ($5.7B) and Department of Agriculture ($1.0B).
Per resident, by award type FY2026
- Contracts $115M
- Grants $83M
- Direct payments $3.5B
- Loans (subsidy cost) $168M
- Other assistance $3.2M
| Per resident | This district | Colorado | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All award obligations | $5,334 | $11,062 | $14,744 |
| Contracts | $159 | $2,252 | $2,007 |
| Grants | $115 | $3,063 | $3,528 |
| Direct payments | $4,824 | $5,689 | $9,185 |
| Loans (subsidy cost) | $232 | $22 | −$16 |
| Other assistance | $4 | $35 | $40 |
| Rank by per-resident rate | 8 of 8 in state · 241 of 436 US | 39 of 51 states | — |
District attribution follows the congressional district USAspending records for the primary place of performance; awards carrying only a state-level location are counted in the state but in no district. Medicare payments are attributed to the district of the administrative contractor.
Obligations by fiscal year
Recipients that dominate the district FY2022–FY2025
| # | Recipient organisation | Obligations | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc. | $659M | 5% |
| 2 | United Power, Inc. | $268M | 2% |
| 3 | Colorado Department of Transportation | $160M | 1% |
| 4 | Maiker Housing Partners | $95M | 1% |
| 5 | York Space Systems LLC | $74M | 1% |
| 6 | Front Range Community College | $69M | 0% |
| 7 | University of Northern Colorado | $54M | 0% |
| 8 | Solid Power Operating, Inc | $50M | 0% |
| 9 | Salud Family Health, Inc. | $44M | 0% |
| 10 | Navarro Research and Engineering, Inc. | $40M | 0% |
| 11 | Advanced Space LLC | $33M | 0% |
| 12 | Adams, County of | $32M | 0% |
| 13 | Housing Authority of the City of Greeley | $30M | 0% |
| 14 | United Food Service, Inc. | $30M | 0% |
| 15 | Weld, County of | $28M | 0% |
| 16 | Aims Local College District | $27M | 0% |
| 17 | Vantor Inc. | $25M | 0% |
| 18 | Golden Aluminum Inc | $22M | 0% |
| 19 | Sunrise Community Health | $22M | 0% |
| 20 | Nexgen Technologies Inc. | $19M | 0% |
| 21 | Protection Strategies Inc | $17M | 0% |
| 22 | Ursa Major Technologies, Inc. | $17M | 0% |
| 23 | Adams County School District 14 | $14M | 0% |
| 24 | Housing Authority of the City of Brighton | $14M | 0% |
| 25 | Renaissance Acquisition Partners, LP | $13M | 0% |
A further $12B among the top 40 went to recipients not shown: individuals, aggregated records and names USAspending withholds.
Who funds the district FY2022–FY2025
Awarding agencies
Assistance programs
Contract industries by NAICS sector
Largest awards performed in the district
Counties in the district
- Adams County 21% of county area
- Weld County 19% of county area
- Larimer County 1% of county area
Other districts in Colorado
Questions and answers
How much federal spending goes to Colorado's 8th congressional district?
$3.9B in award obligations in FY2026 and $15B since FY2023, counting awards whose primary place of performance is in the district. Obligations are commitments, not payments.
How much federal spending per person is that?
$5,334 per resident in FY2026 (population 724,072), against $11,062 for Colorado and $14,744 nationally. Direct payments such as Social Security and Medicare are included; the table on this page splits the rate by award type.
Which recipients dominate Colorado's 8th congressional district?
By obligations over FY2022–FY2025: Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc. ($659M), United Power, Inc. ($268M), Colorado Department of Transportation ($160M), Maiker Housing Partners ($95M) and York Space Systems LLC ($74M). Individuals are never listed.
Which agencies fund Colorado's 8th congressional district?
Social Security Administration ($5.8B), Department of Health and Human Services ($5.7B), Department of Agriculture ($1.0B), Department of Veterans Affairs ($835M) and Department of Housing and Urban Development ($228M), over FY2022–FY2025.
What does "place of performance" mean here?
USAspending records where the work is done or the payment is directed, as reported by the awarding agency. Some awards, especially grants to state governments, carry only a state-level location and are not attributed to any county or district; Medicare payments are attributed to the county of the administrative contractor.
Provenance
Source: USAspending.gov API v2, spending-by-geography (place of performance, congressional district layer, current districts) by fiscal year and award type, loaded 30 Sep 2026; district population as returned by the same endpoint; recipient and agency cross-tabulations for FY2022–FY2025, fetched 18 Sep 2026. Boundaries and county overlap: Census cartographic boundary and relationship files for the 119th Congress. Errors in processing are corrected at the next build; see corrections.