Fed Spend Map

Industries › NAICS 236220

Industry · NAICS 236220 · sector 23 Construction

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Federal contract obligations classified under NAICS 236220, the organisations that win them and the agencies that award them.

USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026.

Federal agencies obligated $31B in contracts classified under NAICS 236220, Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, in FY2025, and $174B over the five fiscal years since FY2022; the industry ranks 6 of 547 on this site.

Obligations were about level on FY2024 ($31B), with $51B so far in FY2026.

The largest recipient organisations over FY2022–FY2025 were BL Harbert International LLC ($4.0B), Caddell Construction Co. (de), LLC ($3.5B) and BCCG a Joint Venture ($3.4B).

By place of performance, the most money went to CA, TX and MD.

$31Bcontract obligations, FY2025FY2025 (1 Oct 2024 – 30 Sep 2025) · obligations
$174Bfive-year totalFY2022–FY2026 to date · obligations
$51BFY2026 to dateFY2026 · obligations
6 of 547rank among industries on this sitefive-year obligations
12,799awards of $1.0M+ since FY2022FY2022–FY2026

Contract obligations by fiscal year

$29B
$33B
$31B
$31B
$51B
FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026*
Contract obligations under NAICS 236220 by fiscal year. *FY2026 runs to the data date and is incomplete.

Compared with the largest industry FY2025

MeasureThis industryAircraft ManufacturingAll contracts
Contract obligations, FY2025$31B$61B$779B
Five-year total$174B$248B$3.7T
Share of all contract obligations, five years4.8%6.8%100%

Top contractors obligations, FY2022–FY2025

#OrganisationObligations
1BL Harbert International LLC$4.0B
2Caddell Construction Co. (de), LLC$3.5B
3BCCG a Joint Venture$3.4B
4Clark Construction Group LLC$2.9B
5The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company$2.1B
6Brasfield & Gorrie LLC$1.8B
7RQ Construction, LLC$1.8B
8Hensel Phelps Construction Co$1.7B
9Weston Solutions Inc$1.4B
10Harper Construction Company, Inc.$1.4B
11Fisher Sand & Gravel Co$1.3B
12Walsh Federal LLC$1.3B
13Grunley Construction Co., Inc.$1.1B
14Conti Federal Services, LLC$1.1B
15Barnard Spencer Joint Venture$1.1B
16Hensel Phelps Construction Co$1.0B
17Hensel Phelps Construction Co$938M
18Nan Inc$905M
19Hensel Phelps Construction Co.$883M
20Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC$860M
21Sauer Construction, LLC$860M
22Structsure Projects Inc$805M
23J & J Maintenance Inc$729M
24CMS Corporation$704M
25Gilbane Federal$682M

Buying agencies $1.0M+ awards

Where the work is performed

Largest awards since FY2022

RecipientAwarding agencyTypeAward valueBegunPlaceRecord
Fisher Sand & Gravel CoDepartment of Homeland SecurityU.S. Customs and Border ProtectionContractDelivery Order$2.8B17 Dec 2025AZUSAspending
Fisher Sand & Gravel CoDepartment of Homeland SecurityU.S. Customs and Border ProtectionContractDelivery Order$2.6B2 Jun 2026TXUSAspending
Fisher Sand & Gravel CoDepartment of Homeland SecurityU.S. Customs and Border ProtectionContractDelivery Order$1.8B6 Jan 2026NMUSAspending
Southwest Valley Constructors CoDepartment of Homeland SecurityU.S. Customs and Border ProtectionContractDelivery Order$1.7B11 May 2026TXUSAspending
Fisher Sand & Gravel CoDepartment of Homeland SecurityU.S. Customs and Border ProtectionContractDelivery Order$1.7B23 Dec 2025AZUSAspending
Barnard Construction Company, IncorporatedDepartment of Homeland SecurityU.S. Customs and Border ProtectionContractDelivery Order$1.6B24 Apr 2026TXUSAspending
SLS Federal Services LLCDepartment of Homeland SecurityU.S. Customs and Border ProtectionContractDelivery Order$1.3B26 Jun 2026AZUSAspending
Fisher Sand & Gravel CoDepartment of Homeland SecurityU.S. Customs and Border ProtectionContractDelivery Order$1.2B26 Sep 2025CAUSAspending
Fisher Sand & Gravel CoDepartment of Homeland SecurityU.S. Customs and Border ProtectionContractDelivery Order$1.2B5 Mar 2026TXUSAspending
Spencer Construction LLCDepartment of Homeland SecurityU.S. Customs and Border ProtectionContractDelivery Order$1.1B18 Mar 2026TXUSAspending

Other industries in sector 23: Construction

Questions and answers

How much does the federal government spend on NAICS 236220?

$31B in contract obligations classified under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction in FY2025, $174B over the five fiscal years since FY2022. Obligations are commitments, not payments.

Who are the top contractors in Commercial and Institutional Building Construction?

BL Harbert International LLC ($4.0B), Caddell Construction Co. (de), LLC ($3.5B), BCCG a Joint Venture ($3.4B), Clark Construction Group LLC ($2.9B), The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company ($2.1B), by contract obligations over FY2022–FY2025.

Which agencies buy in this industry?

By the value of $1.0M-plus contracts since FY2022: Department of Defense ($75B), Department of Homeland Security ($41B), Department of Veterans Affairs ($12B), General Services Administration ($7.1B), Department of State ($6.3B).

What is a NAICS code?

In USAspending's words: "NAICS stands for the North American Industrial Classification System. This 6-digit code tells you what industry the work falls into. Each contract record has a NAICS code." Assistance awards (grants, loans, direct payments) carry no NAICS code and are not counted here.

Provenance

Source: USAspending.gov API v2, spending by category (NAICS) by fiscal year, recipient cross-tabulation for FY2022–FY2025 and award search, loaded 30 Sep 2026. State figures come from each state's top-100 NAICS list, so small amounts in a state may be missing. See methodology.