Fed Spend Map

Industries › NAICS 237110

Industry · NAICS 237110 · sector 23 Construction

Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures Construction

Federal contract obligations classified under NAICS 237110, the organisations that win them and the agencies that award them.

USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026.

Federal agencies obligated $1.6B in contracts classified under NAICS 237110, Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures Construction, in FY2026, and $4.9B over the five fiscal years since FY2023; the industry ranks 72 of 526 on this site.

Obligations were up 61% on FY2025 ($973M), with $0 so far in FY2027.

The largest recipient organisations over FY2022–FY2025 were CDM Constructors Inc ($265M), Jacobs Project Management Co. ($263M) and Stronghold Engineering Inc ($215M).

By place of performance, the most money went to NM, CA and AZ.

$1.6Bcontract obligations, FY2026FY2026 (1 Oct 2025 – 30 Sep 2026) · obligations
$4.9Bfive-year totalFY2023–FY2027 to date · obligations
$0FY2027 to dateFY2027 · obligations
72 of 526rank among industries on this sitefive-year obligations
347awards of $1.0M+ since FY2023FY2023–FY2027

Contract obligations by fiscal year

$1.2B
$1.2B
$973M
$1.6B
$0
FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026FY2027*
Contract obligations under NAICS 237110 by fiscal year. *FY2027 runs to the data date and is incomplete.

Compared with the largest industry FY2026

MeasureThis industryAircraft ManufacturingAll contracts
Contract obligations, FY2026$1.6B$45B$716B
Five-year total$4.9B$211B$3.0T
Share of all contract obligations, five years0.2%7.1%100%

Top contractors obligations, FY2022–FY2025

#OrganisationObligations
1CDM Constructors Inc$265M
2Jacobs Project Management Co.$263M
3Stronghold Engineering Inc$215M
4Environmental Chemical Corporation$173M
5A&R Pacific-Garney Federal JV$155M
6S.J. Louis Construction, Inc$151M
7Oscar Renda Contracting Inc$144M
8Tybe-Garney Federal JV LLC$102M
9Archer Western Construction, LLC$91M
10Hampton Roads Mechanical of Virginia, LLC$65M
11PCL Construction Inc$60M
12Wca Construction, LLC$57M
13Record Steel and Construction, Inc.$56M
14Blumont Engineering Solutions Inc$45M
15Chandler Construction Services, Inc.$44M
16Perini Management Services, Inc.$42M
17Derian/Occ, a Joint Venture$38M
18Sealaska Construction Solutions, LLC$37M
19Aptim-North Wind Construction JV LLC$37M
20Etolin Strait Associates LLC$35M
21Blue World Construction Inc$32M
22Pate Construction Co., Inc.$31M
23Hartman-Walsh Painting Company$31M
24Frawner Corporation$30M
25Transtar Pipeline and Orion Construction JV$30M

Buying agencies $1.0M+ awards

Where the work is performed

Largest awards since FY2023

RecipientAwarding agencyTypeAward valueBegunPlaceRecord
Jacobs Project Management Co.Department of the InteriorBureau of ReclamationContractDefinitive Contract$271M30 Aug 2024NMUSAspending
Stronghold Engineering IncDepartment of the InteriorNational Park ServiceContractDefinitive Contract$225M14 Mar 2023AZUSAspending
A&R Pacific-Garney Federal JVDepartment of DefenseDepartment of the NavyContractDefinitive Contract$155M18 May 2023CAUSAspending
Oscar Renda Contracting IncDepartment of the InteriorBureau of ReclamationContractDefinitive Contract$133M20 Sep 2024COUSAspending
Record Steel and Construction, Inc.Department of the InteriorNational Park ServiceContractDefinitive Contract$129M22 Apr 2026WYUSAspending
G.s.e. Construction Company, Inc.Department of the InteriorNational Park ServiceContractDefinitive Contract$109M28 May 2026WYUSAspending
PCL Construction IncDepartment of StateInternational Boundary and Water Commission: U.S.-MexicoContractDefinitive Contract$106M20 Aug 2024CAUSAspending
Flatland Energy Services LLCDepartment of the InteriorBureau of ReclamationContractDefinitive Contract$76M9 Jun 2026NMUSAspending
Carstensen Contracting IncDepartment of the InteriorBureau of ReclamationContractDefinitive Contract$73M4 Sep 2026NMUSAspending
S.J. Louis Construction, IncDepartment of the InteriorBureau of ReclamationContractDefinitive Contract$72M22 Mar 2023NMUSAspending

Other industries in sector 23: Construction

Questions and answers

How much does the federal government spend on NAICS 237110?

$1.6B in contract obligations classified under Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures Construction in FY2026, $4.9B over the five fiscal years since FY2023. Obligations are commitments, not payments.

Who are the top contractors in Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures Construction?

CDM Constructors Inc ($265M), Jacobs Project Management Co. ($263M), Stronghold Engineering Inc ($215M), Environmental Chemical Corporation ($173M), A&R Pacific-Garney Federal JV ($155M), by contract obligations over FY2022–FY2025.

Which agencies buy in this industry?

By the value of $1.0M-plus contracts since FY2023: Department of the Interior ($1.8B), Department of Defense ($1.2B), Department of Veterans Affairs ($134M), Department of State ($133M), Agency for International Development ($77M).

What is a NAICS code?

In USAspending's words: "NAICS stands for the North American Industrial Classification System. This 6-digit code tells you what industry the work falls into. Each contract record has a NAICS code." Assistance awards (grants, loans, direct payments) carry no NAICS code and are not counted here.

Provenance

Source: USAspending.gov API v2, spending by category (NAICS) by fiscal year, recipient cross-tabulation for FY2022–FY2025 and award search, loaded 30 Sep 2026. State figures come from each state's top-100 NAICS list, so small amounts in a state may be missing. See methodology.