Congressional district · 119th Congress boundaries
Federal spending in OK-02: Oklahoma's 2nd congressional district
USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026.
In FY2026, $6.7B in federal awards named Oklahoma's 2nd congressional district as the primary place of performance, $8,442 per resident.
That is below the Oklahoma rate of $11,723 per resident and below the national rate of $14,744; it ranks 2 of 5 districts in the state.
The FY2026 mix was 82% direct payments, 14% grants.
Obligations were about level on FY2025, and the five-year total since FY2023 is $26B.
Over FY2022–FY2025, the largest awarding agencies were Social Security Administration ($17B), Department of Veterans Affairs ($3.5B) and Department of Transportation ($1.3B).
Per resident, by award type FY2026
- Contracts $272M
- Grants $907M
- Direct payments $5.5B
- Loans (subsidy cost) $2.4M
- Other assistance $56M
| Per resident | This district | Oklahoma | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All award obligations | $8,442 | $11,723 | $14,744 |
| Contracts | $342 | $1,124 | $2,007 |
| Grants | $1,140 | $3,652 | $3,528 |
| Direct payments | $6,887 | $6,927 | $9,185 |
| Loans (subsidy cost) | $3 | −$23 | −$16 |
| Other assistance | $70 | $43 | $40 |
| Rank by per-resident rate | 2 of 5 in state · 95 of 436 US | 35 of 51 states | — |
District attribution follows the congressional district USAspending records for the primary place of performance; awards carrying only a state-level location are counted in the state but in no district. Medicare payments are attributed to the district of the administrative contractor.
Obligations by fiscal year
Recipients that dominate the district FY2022–FY2025
A further $21B among the top 40 went to recipients not shown: individuals, aggregated records and names USAspending withholds.
Who funds the district FY2022–FY2025
Awarding agencies
Assistance programs
Contract industries by NAICS sector
Largest awards performed in the district
| Recipient | Awarding agency | Type | Award value | Begun | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kamo Electric Cooperative Inc | Department of AgricultureRural Utilities Service | LoanDirect Loan (e) | $226Mloan face value | 15 Sep 2025 | USAspending |
| Oklahoma Department of Transportation | Department of TransportationFederal Highway Administration | GrantProject Grant (B) | $124M | 8 Sep 2025 | USAspending |
| Kre JV, LLC | Department of DefenseDepartment of the Army | ContractDefinitive Contract | $98M | 17 Sep 2025 | USAspending |
| Alberici Constructors Inc | Department of DefenseDepartment of the Army | ContractDefinitive Contract | $64M | 15 Dec 2025 | USAspending |
| Bryan Cty RWS&SWM#2 | Department of AgricultureRural Utilities Service | LoanDirect Loan (e) | $57Mloan face value | 21 May 2026 | USAspending |
| Blue Whale Materials LLC | Department of Energy | GrantProject Grant (B) | $55M | 2 Jan 2025 | USAspending |
| Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma | Department of CommerceNational Telecommunications and Information Administration | GrantProject Grant (B) | $46M | 10 Jan 2025 | USAspending |
| Cherokee Nation | Department of AgricultureAgricultural Marketing Service | GrantBlock Grant (a) | $46M | 20 Oct 2022 | USAspending |
| Southeastern Elect Co Op | Department of AgricultureRural Utilities Service | LoanDirect Loan (e) | $45Mloan face value | 12 Aug 2024 | USAspending |
| Muscogee Creek Nation | Department of CommerceNational Telecommunications and Information Administration | GrantProject Grant (B) | $41M | 14 Jan 2025 | USAspending |
Counties in the district
- Adair County 100% of county area
- Atoka County 100% of county area
- Bryan County 100% of county area
- Cherokee County 100% of county area
- Choctaw County 100% of county area
- Coal County 100% of county area
- Craig County 100% of county area
- Delaware County 100% of county area
- Haskell County 100% of county area
- Hughes County 100% of county area
- Johnston County 100% of county area
- Latimer County 100% of county area
- Le Flore County 100% of county area
- McCurtain County 100% of county area
- McIntosh County 100% of county area
- Marshall County 100% of county area
- Mayes County 100% of county area
- Muskogee County 100% of county area
- Nowata County 100% of county area
- Okfuskee County 100% of county area
- Okmulgee County 100% of county area
- Ottawa County 100% of county area
- Pittsburg County 100% of county area
- Pushmataha County 100% of county area
- Sequoyah County 100% of county area
- Washington County 100% of county area
- Rogers County 95% of county area
- Wagoner County 39% of county area
Other districts in Oklahoma
Questions and answers
How much federal spending goes to Oklahoma's 2nd congressional district?
$6.7B in award obligations in FY2026 and $26B since FY2023, counting awards whose primary place of performance is in the district. Obligations are commitments, not payments.
How much federal spending per person is that?
$8,442 per resident in FY2026 (population 795,387), against $11,723 for Oklahoma and $14,744 nationally. Direct payments such as Social Security and Medicare are included; the table on this page splits the rate by award type.
Which recipients dominate Oklahoma's 2nd congressional district?
By obligations over FY2022–FY2025: Oklahoma Department of Transportation ($1.1B), Cherokee Nation ($614M), Muscogee Creek Nation ($260M), Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma ($185M) and Department of Veterans Affairs Oklahoma ($87M). Individuals are never listed.
Which agencies fund Oklahoma's 2nd congressional district?
Social Security Administration ($17B), Department of Veterans Affairs ($3.5B), Department of Transportation ($1.3B), Department of Agriculture ($892M) and Department of Health and Human Services ($658M), over FY2022–FY2025.
What does "place of performance" mean here?
USAspending records where the work is done or the payment is directed, as reported by the awarding agency. Some awards, especially grants to state governments, carry only a state-level location and are not attributed to any county or district; Medicare payments are attributed to the county of the administrative contractor.
Provenance
Source: USAspending.gov API v2, spending-by-geography (place of performance, congressional district layer, current districts) by fiscal year and award type, loaded 30 Sep 2026; district population as returned by the same endpoint; recipient and agency cross-tabulations for FY2022–FY2025, fetched 18 Sep 2026. Boundaries and county overlap: Census cartographic boundary and relationship files for the 119th Congress. Errors in processing are corrected at the next build; see corrections.