Congressional district · 119th Congress boundaries
Federal spending in TX-36: Texas's 36th congressional district
USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026.
Federal agencies obligated $3.7B for work and payments in Texas's 36th congressional district in FY2026, or $4,776 per resident.
That is below the Texas rate of $10,303 per resident (46% of it) and below the national rate of $14,744; it ranks 19 of 38 districts in the state.
The FY2026 mix was 53% contracts, 44% direct payments.
Obligations were about level on FY2025, and the five-year total since FY2023 is $15B.
Over FY2022–FY2025, the largest awarding agencies were Social Security Administration ($4.7B), National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($4.5B) and Department of Defense ($3.0B).
Per resident, by award type FY2026
- Contracts $2.0B
- Grants $87M
- Direct payments $1.7B
- Loans (subsidy cost) $5.6M
- Other assistance $5.9M
| Per resident | This district | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All award obligations | $4,776 | $10,303 | $14,744 |
| Contracts | $2,531 | $3,001 | $2,007 |
| Grants | $111 | $2,395 | $3,528 |
| Direct payments | $2,119 | $4,890 | $9,185 |
| Loans (subsidy cost) | $7 | −$10 | −$16 |
| Other assistance | $8 | $27 | $40 |
| Rank by per-resident rate | 19 of 38 in state · 270 of 436 US | 45 of 51 states | — |
District attribution follows the congressional district USAspending records for the primary place of performance; awards carrying only a state-level location are counted in the state but in no district. Medicare payments are attributed to the district of the administrative contractor.
Obligations by fiscal year
Recipients that dominate the district FY2022–FY2025
| # | Recipient organisation | Obligations | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Petromax Refining Company LLC | $2.0B | 15% |
| 2 | The Boeing Company | $1.5B | 11% |
| 3 | KBR Wyle Services, LLC | $588M | 4% |
| 4 | Hamilton Sundstrand Space Systems International, Inc. | $456M | 3% |
| 5 | Axiom Space Inc | $388M | 3% |
| 6 | Cargill, Incorporated | $385M | 3% |
| 7 | Texas Department of Transportation | $365M | 3% |
| 8 | Exxon Mobil Corporation | $332M | 2% |
| 9 | Barrios Technology, LLC | $269M | 2% |
| 10 | Intuitive Machines, LLC | $266M | 2% |
| 11 | Techtrans International Inc | $235M | 2% |
| 12 | Booz Allen Hamilton Inc | $222M | 2% |
| 13 | Leidos, Inc. | $204M | 1% |
| 14 | San Jacinto Community College District | $199M | 1% |
| 15 | Petromax, LLC | $189M | 1% |
| 16 | McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. | $176M | 1% |
| 17 | Healtheon, Inc | $78M | 1% |
| 18 | CHS Inc. | $73M | 1% |
| 19 | University of Houston System | $72M | 1% |
| 20 | Weeks Marine, Inc. | $69M | 0% |
| 21 | Braskem America, Inc | $50M | 0% |
| 22 | Lee College District | $49M | 0% |
| 23 | Aegis Aerospace Inc | $45M | 0% |
| 24 | Housing Authority of the City of Baytown | $40M | 0% |
| 25 | Thyssenkrupp Nucera Usa, Inc. | $39M | 0% |
A further $5.6B among the top 40 went to recipients not shown: individuals, aggregated records and names USAspending withholds.
Who funds the district FY2022–FY2025
Awarding agencies
Assistance programs
Contract industries by NAICS sector
Largest awards performed in the district
Counties in the district
- Hardin County 100% of county area
- Jasper County 100% of county area
- Liberty County 100% of county area
- Newton County 100% of county area
- Tyler County 100% of county area
- Chambers County 99% of county area
- Jefferson County 29% of county area
- Harris County 15% of county area
Other districts in Texas
- TX-01 $6,748
- TX-02 $79
- TX-03 $3,802
- TX-04 $3,421
- TX-05 $3,197
- TX-06 $3,859
- TX-07 $2,923
- TX-08 $1,239
- TX-09 $1,249
- TX-10 $3,733
- TX-11 $6,265
- TX-12 $16,124
- TX-13 $9,505
- TX-14 $9,774
- TX-15 $2,228
- TX-16 $12,980
- TX-17 $7,475
- TX-18 $1,757
- TX-19 $6,524
- TX-20 $5,739
- TX-21 $6,222
- TX-22 $6,517
- TX-23 $17,327
- TX-24 $2,653
- TX-25 $3,371
- TX-26 $738
- TX-27 $7,515
- TX-28 $10,692
- TX-29 $257
- TX-30 $2,335
- TX-31 $6,429
- TX-32 $543
- TX-33 $35,184
- TX-34 $4,791
- TX-35 $2,400
- TX-37 $16,577
- TX-38 $827
Questions and answers
How much federal spending goes to Texas's 36th congressional district?
$3.7B in award obligations in FY2026 and $15B since FY2023, counting awards whose primary place of performance is in the district. Obligations are commitments, not payments.
How much federal spending per person is that?
$4,776 per resident in FY2026 (population 782,741), against $10,303 for Texas and $14,744 nationally. Direct payments such as Social Security and Medicare are included; the table on this page splits the rate by award type.
Which recipients dominate Texas's 36th congressional district?
By obligations over FY2022–FY2025: Petromax Refining Company LLC ($2.0B), The Boeing Company ($1.5B), KBR Wyle Services, LLC ($588M), Hamilton Sundstrand Space Systems International, Inc. ($456M) and Axiom Space Inc ($388M). Individuals are never listed.
Which agencies fund Texas's 36th congressional district?
Social Security Administration ($4.7B), National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($4.5B), Department of Defense ($3.0B), Department of Veterans Affairs ($717M) and Department of Agriculture ($598M), over FY2022–FY2025.
What does "place of performance" mean here?
USAspending records where the work is done or the payment is directed, as reported by the awarding agency. Some awards, especially grants to state governments, carry only a state-level location and are not attributed to any county or district; Medicare payments are attributed to the county of the administrative contractor.
Provenance
Source: USAspending.gov API v2, spending-by-geography (place of performance, congressional district layer, current districts) by fiscal year and award type, loaded 30 Sep 2026; district population as returned by the same endpoint; recipient and agency cross-tabulations for FY2022–FY2025, fetched 18 Sep 2026. Boundaries and county overlap: Census cartographic boundary and relationship files for the 119th Congress. Errors in processing are corrected at the next build; see corrections.