Fed Spend Map

Industries › NAICS 541690

Industry · NAICS 541690 · sector 54 Professional, scientific and technical services

Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services

Federal contract obligations classified under NAICS 541690, the organisations that win them and the agencies that award them.

USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026.

Federal agencies obligated $1.9B in contracts classified under NAICS 541690, Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services, in FY2026, and $8.6B over the five fiscal years since FY2023; the industry ranks 47 of 526 on this site.

Obligations were down 11% on FY2025 ($2.2B), with $0 so far in FY2027.

The largest recipient organisations over FY2022–FY2025 were Kelly Services, Inc. ($703M), Lockheed Martin Corporation ($278M) and Parsons Government Services Inc. ($220M).

By place of performance, the most money went to VA, MD and MI.

$1.9Bcontract obligations, FY2026FY2026 (1 Oct 2025 – 30 Sep 2026) · obligations
$8.6Bfive-year totalFY2023–FY2027 to date · obligations
$0FY2027 to dateFY2027 · obligations
47 of 526rank among industries on this sitefive-year obligations
780awards of $1.0M+ since FY2023FY2023–FY2027

Contract obligations by fiscal year

$2.0B
$2.4B
$2.2B
$1.9B
$0
FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026FY2027*
Contract obligations under NAICS 541690 by fiscal year. *FY2027 runs to the data date and is incomplete.

Compared with the largest industry FY2026

MeasureThis industryAircraft ManufacturingAll contracts
Contract obligations, FY2026$1.9B$45B$716B
Five-year total$8.6B$211B$3.0T
Share of all contract obligations, five years0.3%7.1%100%

Top contractors obligations, FY2022–FY2025

#OrganisationObligations
1Kelly Services, Inc.$703M
2Lockheed Martin Corporation$278M
3Parsons Government Services Inc.$220M
4System High Corporation$183M
5Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc.$163M
6Chemonics International, Inc.$162M
7Unwin Co$152M
8General Dynamics One Source LLC$145M
9General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.$141M
10Axle Informatics, LLC$136M
11Leidos, Inc.$123M
12Michael Stapleton Associates, LTD.$122M
13Palladium International LLC$114M
14Raytheon Company$102M
15RMC 2021 LLC$101M
16Research Triangle Institute$100M
17Gap Solutions, Inc.$97M
18Dependable Global Solutions, LLC$95M
19National Academy of Sciences$89M
20Janus Research Group, LLC$89M
21Booz Allen Hamilton Inc$87M
22Essex Management LLC$82M
23PAE Government Services, Inc.$77M
24JP Systems, Inc.$75M
25Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation$73M

$618M among the top 40 went to recipients not shown.

Buying agencies $1.0M+ awards

Where the work is performed

Largest awards since FY2023

RecipientAwarding agencyTypeAward valueBegunPlaceRecord
Recipient not shownAgency for International DevelopmentContractDefinitive Contract$897M31 Mar 2024—USAspending
Recipient not shownAgency for International DevelopmentContractDefinitive Contract$98M30 Mar 2024—USAspending
Parsons Government Services Inc.Department of DefenseDepartment of the Air ForceContractDelivery Order$77M27 Mar 2025—USAspending
Parsons Government Services Inc.Department of DefenseDepartment of the Air ForceContractDelivery Order$66M29 Sep 2025—USAspending
Research Triangle InstituteAgency for International DevelopmentContractDefinitive Contract$48M15 Jun 2023—USAspending
General Dynamics One Source LLCDepartment of DefenseDepartment of the Air ForceContractDelivery Order$43M25 Feb 2025VAUSAspending
Parsons Government Services Inc.Department of DefenseDepartment of the Air ForceContractDelivery Order$41M3 Feb 2023—USAspending
Unwin CoDepartment of EnergyContractDefinitive Contract$37M17 Feb 2026DCUSAspending
National Opinion Research CenterDepartment of Health and Human ServicesOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Financial ResourcesContractDelivery Order$34M13 Feb 2023MDUSAspending
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc.Department of Health and Human ServicesFood and Drug AdministrationContractDefinitive Contract$33M26 Mar 2026MAUSAspending

Other industries in sector 54: Professional, scientific and technical services

Questions and answers

How much does the federal government spend on NAICS 541690?

$1.9B in contract obligations classified under Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services in FY2026, $8.6B over the five fiscal years since FY2023. Obligations are commitments, not payments.

Who are the top contractors in Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services?

Kelly Services, Inc. ($703M), Lockheed Martin Corporation ($278M), Parsons Government Services Inc. ($220M), System High Corporation ($183M), Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc. ($163M), by contract obligations over FY2022–FY2025.

Which agencies buy in this industry?

By the value of $1.0M-plus contracts since FY2023: Department of Health and Human Services ($1.4B), Department of Defense ($1.3B), Agency for International Development ($1.2B), Department of Homeland Security ($111M), Department of the Interior ($109M).

What is a NAICS code?

In USAspending's words: "NAICS stands for the North American Industrial Classification System. This 6-digit code tells you what industry the work falls into. Each contract record has a NAICS code." Assistance awards (grants, loans, direct payments) carry no NAICS code and are not counted here.

Provenance

Source: USAspending.gov API v2, spending by category (NAICS) by fiscal year, recipient cross-tabulation for FY2022–FY2025 and award search, loaded 30 Sep 2026. State figures come from each state's top-100 NAICS list, so small amounts in a state may be missing. See methodology.