States › California › CA-37
Congressional district · 119th Congress boundaries
Federal spending in CA-37: California's 37th congressional district
USAspending caveat. Figures are obligations reported by federal agencies to USAspending.gov, not payments. In USAspending's words: "An outlay occurs when federal money is actually paid out, not just promised to be paid ('obligated')." "Every agency has a Senior Accountable Official who must officially certify that the quarterly financial data submitted by their agency is accurate and complete." "If there are any discrepancies in procurement data, FPDS is the authoritative source." Contract data for the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is published with a 90-day delay. Data loaded 30 Sep 2026.
California's 37th congressional district received $579M in federal award obligations in FY2026: $769 for each of its 752,632 residents.
That is below the California rate of $12,003 per resident (6% of it) and below the national rate of $14,744; it ranks 43 of 52 districts in the state.
The FY2026 mix was 43% direct payments, 36% grants, 21% contracts.
Obligations were about level on FY2025, and the five-year total since FY2023 is $2.6B.
Over FY2022–FY2025, the largest awarding agencies were Department of Housing and Urban Development ($630M), Department of Health and Human Services ($619M) and Department of Defense ($616M).
Per resident, by award type FY2026
- Contracts $122M
- Grants $206M
- Direct payments $249M
- Loans (subsidy cost) $746K
- Other assistance $1.6M
| Per resident | This district | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All award obligations | $769 | $12,003 | $14,744 |
| Contracts | $162 | $1,414 | $2,007 |
| Grants | $273 | $4,202 | $3,528 |
| Direct payments | $331 | $6,400 | $9,185 |
| Loans (subsidy cost) | $1 | −$31 | −$16 |
| Other assistance | $2 | $17 | $40 |
| Rank by per-resident rate | 43 of 52 in state · 397 of 436 US | 34 of 51 states | — |
District attribution follows the congressional district USAspending records for the primary place of performance; awards carrying only a state-level location are counted in the state but in no district. Medicare payments are attributed to the district of the administrative contractor.
Obligations by fiscal year
Recipients that dominate the district FY2022–FY2025
| # | Recipient organisation | Obligations | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of Southern California | $1.1B | 53% |
| 2 | Linquest Corporation | $274M | 13% |
| 3 | Management & Training Corporation | $98M | 5% |
| 4 | Los Angeles Trade Technical College | $77M | 4% |
| 5 | Sawasawa LLC | $57M | 3% |
| 6 | Los Angeles Community College District | $47M | 2% |
| 7 | Val-Pro, Inc. | $35M | 2% |
| 8 | Olive Street Preservation LP | $34M | 2% |
| 9 | Polyclinic Owner LLC | $30M | 1% |
| 10 | Standard Bridgeview Venture LP | $28M | 1% |
| 11 | South Bay Community Villas LP | $28M | 1% |
| 12 | University of Southern California | $25M | 1% |
| 13 | Apex Technology, Inc. | $24M | 1% |
| 14 | AECOM Technical Services, Inc. | $19M | 1% |
| 15 | Standard Foothill Venture LP | $17M | 1% |
| 16 | Baldwin Villa Plaza Apartment | $16M | 1% |
| 17 | ST Andrews Gardens, L.P. | $15M | 1% |
| 18 | Kal Krishnan Consulting Services, Inc. | $15M | 1% |
| 19 | Standard Lakeview Venture LP | $15M | 1% |
| 20 | Vallejo Imperial Venture LP | $15M | 1% |
| 21 | Standard Snowden Venture LP | $14M | 1% |
| 22 | Standard VLR Venture LP | $14M | 1% |
| 23 | Stovall Development Corporation | $14M | 1% |
| 24 | Standard Braywood Manor Venture LP | $13M | 1% |
| 25 | Central Al 10 Apartments LLC | $13M | 1% |
A further $11M among the top 40 went to recipients not shown: individuals, aggregated records and names USAspending withholds.
Who funds the district FY2022–FY2025
Awarding agencies
Assistance programs
Contract industries by NAICS sector
Largest awards performed in the district
Counties in the district
- Los Angeles County 1% of county area
Other districts in California
- CA-01 $6,719
- CA-02 $5,549
- CA-03 $5,788
- CA-04 $2,778
- CA-05 $2,276
- CA-06 $1,075
- CA-07 $8,502
- CA-08 $680
- CA-09 $5,179
- CA-10 $1,328
- CA-11 $4,853
- CA-12 $4,444
- CA-13 $2,248
- CA-14 $5,727
- CA-15 $1,568
- CA-16 $4,346
- CA-17 $2,543
- CA-18 $2,119
- CA-19 $1,363
- CA-20 $1,650
- CA-21 $829
- CA-22 $544
- CA-23 $1,298
- CA-24 $4,860
- CA-25 $3,668
- CA-26 $7,058
- CA-27 $1,343
- CA-28 $4,742
- CA-29 $259
- CA-30 $729
- CA-31 $1,239
- CA-32 $1,612
- CA-33 $557
- CA-34 $2,613
- CA-35 $472
- CA-36 $8,656
- CA-38 $1,595
- CA-39 $817
- CA-40 $420
- CA-41 $1,029
- CA-42 $1,845
- CA-43 $4,230
- CA-44 $637
- CA-45 $573
- CA-46 $1,308
- CA-47 $3,263
- CA-48 $3,222
- CA-49 $1,163
- CA-50 $7,927
- CA-51 $2,572
- CA-52 $7,890
Questions and answers
How much federal spending goes to California's 37th congressional district?
$579M in award obligations in FY2026 and $2.6B since FY2023, counting awards whose primary place of performance is in the district. Obligations are commitments, not payments.
How much federal spending per person is that?
$769 per resident in FY2026 (population 752,632), against $12,003 for California and $14,744 nationally. Direct payments such as Social Security and Medicare are included; the table on this page splits the rate by award type.
Which recipients dominate California's 37th congressional district?
By obligations over FY2022–FY2025: University of Southern California ($1.1B), Linquest Corporation ($274M), Management & Training Corporation ($98M), Los Angeles Trade Technical College ($77M) and Sawasawa LLC ($57M). Individuals are never listed.
Which agencies fund California's 37th congressional district?
Department of Housing and Urban Development ($630M), Department of Health and Human Services ($619M), Department of Defense ($616M), Department of Education ($327M) and National Science Foundation ($160M), over FY2022–FY2025.
What does "place of performance" mean here?
USAspending records where the work is done or the payment is directed, as reported by the awarding agency. Some awards, especially grants to state governments, carry only a state-level location and are not attributed to any county or district; Medicare payments are attributed to the county of the administrative contractor.
Provenance
Source: USAspending.gov API v2, spending-by-geography (place of performance, congressional district layer, current districts) by fiscal year and award type, loaded 30 Sep 2026; district population as returned by the same endpoint; recipient and agency cross-tabulations for FY2022–FY2025, fetched 18 Sep 2026. Boundaries and county overlap: Census cartographic boundary and relationship files for the 119th Congress. Errors in processing are corrected at the next build; see corrections.